Browser extension

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Browser addon)

Template:Short description Template:DMCA

A browser extension is a software module for customizing a web browser. Browsers typically allow users to install a variety of extensions, including user interface modifications, cookie management, ad blocking,[1] and custom scripting and styling of web pages.[1]

Browser plug-ins are a different type of module and no longer supported by the major browsers.[2][3] One difference is that extensions are distributed as source code, while plug-ins are executables (i.e. object code).[2] The most popular browser, Google Chrome,[4] has over 230,000 extensions available[5] but stopped supporting plug-ins in 2020.[6]

History

Internet Explorer was the first major browser to support extensions, with the release of version 4 in 1997.[7] Firefox has supported extensions since its launch in 2004. Opera and Chrome began supporting extensions in 2009,[8] and Safari did so the following year. Microsoft Edge added extension support in 2016.[9]

API conformity

In 2015, a community group formed under the W3C to create a single standard application programming interface (API) for browser extensions.[10] While this particular work did not reach fruition,[11] every major browser now has the same or very similar API due to the popularity of Google Chrome.[4][12]

Chrome was the first browser with an extension API based solely on HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Beta testing for this capability began in 2009,[13][14] and the following year Google opened the Chrome Web Store. As of June 2012, there were 750 million total installations of extensions and other content hosted on the store.[15] In the same year, Chrome overtook Internet Explorer as the world's most popular browser,[16] and its usage share reached 60% in 2018.[17]

Because of Chrome's success, Microsoft created a very similar extension API for its Edge browser, with the goal of making it easy for Chrome extension developers to port their work to Edge.[18] But after three years Edge still had a disappointingly small market share, so Microsoft rebuilt it as a Chromium-based browser.[19][20] (Chromium is Google's open-source project that serves as the functional core of Chrome and many other browsers.) Now that Edge has the same API as Chrome, extensions can be installed directly from the Chrome Web Store.[21]

In 2015, Mozilla announced that the long-standing XUL and XPCOM extension capabilities of Firefox would be replaced with a less-permissive API very similar to Chrome's.[22] This change was enacted in 2017.[23][24] Firefox extensions are now largely compatible with their Chrome counterparts.[25]

Apple was the last major exception to this trend, but support for extensions conforming to the Chrome API was added to Safari for macOS in 2020.[26] Extensions were later enabled in the iOS version for the first time.[27]

In 2021, these browser vendors formed a new W3C community group, called WebExtensions, to "specify a model, permissions, and a common core of APIs".[28] However, Google joined this during its overhaul of Chrome's extension API, known as Manifest V3, which greatly reduces the capability of ad blockers and privacy-related extensions.[29][30][31] Thus the WebExtensions group is viewed by some extension developers as nothing more than Google imposing its Manifest V3 design.[32][33][34]

Unwanted behavior

Browser extensions typically have access to sensitive data, such as browsing history, and they have the ability to alter some browser settings, add user interface items, or replace website content.[35][36] As a result, there have been instances of malware, so users need to be cautious about what extensions they install.[37][38][39][40]

There have also been cases of applications installing browser extensions without the user's knowledge, making it hard for the user to uninstall the unwanted extension.[41]

Some Google Chrome extension developers have sold their extensions to third-parties who then incorporated adware.[42][43] In 2014, Google removed two such extensions from the Chrome Web Store after many users complained about unwanted pop-up ads.[44] The following year, Google acknowledged that about five percent of visits to its own websites had been altered by extensions with adware.[45][46][47]

References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."What are extensions?". MDN Web Docs. Retrieved 5 August 2019.
  2. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Plugin". developer.mozilla.org. 9 September 2022. Retrieved 7 December 2022.
  3. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Why Browser Plug-Ins Are Going Away and What's Replacing Them". howtogeek.com. 8 January 2014. Retrieved 6 June 2023.
  4. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."StatCounter Global Stats". StatCounter. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  5. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Chrome extension statistics (Jan 2026)". chrome-stats.com. Retrieved 23 January 2026.
  6. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Google Chrome 88 released: RIP Flash Player". Retrieved 29 January 2021.
  7. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Browser Extensions". 15 August 2017. Retrieved 29 September 2020.
  8. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Edwards, Lin; Phys.org. "Google Chrome extensions to be officially released". phys.org. Retrieved 27 April 2023.
  9. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bright, Peter (18 March 2016). "Edge browser now has extensions in the latest Windows 10 preview". Ars Technica. Condé Nast.
  10. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Browser Extension Community Group Charter — Browser Extension Community Group". browserext.github.io. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
  11. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Re: One question from Florian Rivoal on 2017-07-29 (public-browserext@w3.org from July 2017)". lists.w3.org. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
  12. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Build a cross-browser extension - Mozilla | MDN". developer.mozilla.org. 21 November 2024. Retrieved 10 January 2025.
  13. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Extensions Status: On the Runway, Getting Ready for Take-Off". Chromium Blog. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
  14. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Extensions beta launched, with over 300 extensions!". Chromium Blog. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
  15. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Vikas SN (29 June 2012). "The Lowdown: Google I/O 2012 Day 2 – 310M Chrome Users, 425M Gmail & More". MediaNama. Retrieved 14 June 2013.
  16. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Internet Explorer usage to plummet below 50 percent by mid-2012". 3 September 2011. Archived from the original on 20 November 2011. Retrieved 4 September 2011.
  17. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Statcounter. "Browser Market Share Worldwide | StatCounter Global Stats". gs.statcounter.com. Retrieved 20 October 2018.
  18. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Porting an extension from Chrome to Microsoft Edge". Microsoft. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
  19. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Microsoft Edge: Making the web better through more open source collaboration". Windows Experience Blog. 6 December 2018. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
  20. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Keizer, Gregg (8 December 2018). "With move to rebuild Edge atop Google's Chromium, Microsoft raises white flag in browser war". Computerworld. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
  21. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Add or remove extensions in Microsoft Edge". Microsoft. Retrieved 8 June 2020.
  22. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."The Future of Developing Firefox Add-ons". Mozilla Add-ons Blog. 21 August 2015. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  23. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Upcoming Changes in Compatibility Features". Mozilla Add-ons Blog. 10 August 2017. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  24. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."How to enable legacy extensions in Firefox 57 - gHacks Tech News". www.ghacks.net. 12 August 2017. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
  25. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Porting a Google Chrome extension". Mozilla. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
  26. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Safari 14 Release Notes". 2020. Archived from the original on 23 March 2022. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
  27. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Ortolani, Parker (21 September 2021). "Here are the best new Safari extensions to download for iOS 15 and iPadOS 15 (Updated)". 9to5Mac. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  28. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."WebExtensions Community Group". w3.org. 3 April 2023. Retrieved 24 March 2024.
  29. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Barnett, Daly (9 December 2021). "Chrome Users Beware: Manifest V3 is Deceitful and Threatening". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved 22 November 2023.
  30. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Amadeo, Ron (1 December 2023). "Chrome's next weapon in the War on Ad Blockers: Slower extension updates". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
  31. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Inside the 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers". Engadget. 1 December 2023. Retrieved 2 December 2023.
  32. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Stuwe, Cuyler (29 December 2021). "Re: Do not outlaw dynamic code". GitHub. Nobody outside of Google really has any meaningful sway, since Chrome currently owns nearly all of the market share; Google sets the rules, other people nitpick minor details, and everyone pretends that everyone had a meaningful say.
  33. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Re: Do not outlaw dynamic code". GitHub. 2 January 2022. Google has shown no interest whatsoever in deviating from their original plans. So, it's quite clear what's happening here. MV3 is a business decision, not an engineering decision.
  34. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Re: Manifest v3 background scripts should not be killed when there are active listeners". GitHub. 7 January 2024.
  35. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Protect User Privacy". Google Chrome Docs. 18 March 2018. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  36. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Add-on Policies". MDN Web Docs. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  37. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Security firm ICEBRG uncovers 4 malicious Chrome extensions - gHacks Tech News". www.ghacks.net. 16 January 2018. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  38. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Google's bad track record of malicious Chrome extensions continues - gHacks Tech News". www.ghacks.net. 11 May 2018. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  39. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Chrome Extension Devs Use Sneaky Landing Pages after Google Bans Inline Installs". BleepingComputer. Retrieved 15 December 2018.
  40. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Google Chrome extensions with 500,000 downloads found to be malicious". Ars Technica. 17 January 2018. Retrieved 30 December 2018.
  41. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."PUP Criteria". Malwarebytes. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  42. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Adware vendors buy Chrome Extensions to send ad- and malware-filled updates". Ars Technica. 17 January 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  43. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bruce Schneier (21 January 2014). "Adware Vendors Buy and Abuse Chrome Extensions".
  44. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Winkler, Rolfe (19 January 2014). "Google Removes Two Chrome Extensions Amid Ad Uproar". blogs.wsj.com. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
  45. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Ad Injection at Scale: Assessing Deceptive Advertisement Modifications" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 June 2015.
  46. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Superfish injects ads into 5 percent of all Google page views". PC World. IDG.
  47. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Superfish injects ads in one in 25 Google page views". CIO. IDG. Archived from the original on 11 December 2019. Retrieved 16 June 2015.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found.