Bias

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Unbiased)

Template:Short description Script error: No such module "other uses".

Interpretations of the random patterns of craters on the Moon. A common example of a perceptual bias caused by pareidolia.

Bias is a disproportionate weight in favor of or against an idea or thing, usually in a way that is inaccurate, closed-minded, prejudicial, or unfair. Biases can be innate or learned. People may develop biases for or against an individual, a group, or a belief.[1] In science and engineering, a bias is a systematic error. Statistical bias results from an unfair sampling of a population, or from an estimation process that does not give accurate results on average.[2]

Etymology

The word appears to derive from Old Provençal into Old French biais, "sideways, askance, against the grain". Whence comes French biais, "a slant, a slope, an oblique".[3]

It seems to have entered English via the game of bowls, where it referred to balls made with a greater weight on one side. Then, it expanded to the figurative use, "a one-sided tendency of the mind", and, at first especially in law, "undue propensity or prejudice".[3] or ballast, used to lower the centre of gravity of a ship to increase stability and to keep the ship from one side.[4]

Types

Cognitive biases

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". A cognitive bias is a repeating or basic misstep in thinking, assessing, recollecting, or other cognitive processes.[5] That is, a pattern of deviation from standards in judgment, whereby inferences may be created unreasonably.[6] People create their own "subjective social reality" from their own perceptions,[7] their view of the world may dictate their behaviour.[8] Thus, cognitive biases may sometimes lead to perceptual distortion, inaccurate judgment, illogical interpretation, or what is broadly called irrationality.[9][10][11] However some cognitive biases are taken to be adaptive, and thus may lead to success in the appropriate situation.[12] Furthermore, cognitive biases as an example through education may allow faster choice selection when speedier outcomes for a task are more valuable than precision.[13] Other cognitive biases are a "by-product" of human processing limitations,[14] coming about because of an absence of appropriate mental mechanisms, or just from human limitations in information processing.[15]

Anchoring

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Anchoring is a psychological heuristic that describes the propensity to rely on the first piece of information encountered when making decisions.[16][17][18] According to this heuristic, individuals begin with an implicitly suggested reference point (the "anchor") and make adjustments to it to reach their estimate.[2] For example, the initial price offered for a used car sets the standard for the rest of the negotiations, so that prices lower than the initial price seem more reasonable even if they are still higher than what the car is worth.[19][20]

Apophenia

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Apophenia, also known as patternicity,[21][22] or agenticity,[23] is the human tendency to perceive meaningful patterns within random data. Apophenia is well documented as a rationalization for gambling. Gamblers may imagine that they see patterns in the numbers which appear in lotteries, card games, or roulette wheels.[24] One manifestation of this is known as the "gambler's fallacy".

Pareidolia is the visual or auditory form of apophenia. It has been suggested that pareidolia combined with hierophany may have helped ancient societies organize chaos and make the world intelligible.[25][26]

Attribution bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". An attribution bias could happen when individuals assess or attempt to discover explanations behind their own and others' behaviors.[27][28][29] People make attributions about the causes of their own and others' behaviors; but these attributions do not necessarily precisely reflect reality. Rather than operating as objective perceivers, individuals are inclined to perceptual slips that prompt biased understandings of their social world.[30][31] When judging others we tend to assume their actions are the result of internal factors such as personality, whereas we tend to assume our own actions arise because of the necessity of external circumstances. There are a wide range of sorts of attribution biases, such as the ultimate attribution error, fundamental attribution error, actor-observer bias, and self-serving bias.

Examples of attribution bias:[32]

Confirmation bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

A drawing of a man sitting on a stool at a writing desk
Confirmation bias has been described as an internal "yes man", echoing back a person's beliefs like Charles Dickens' character Uriah Heep.[33]

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's beliefs or hypotheses while giving disproportionately less attention to information that contradicts it.[34] The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. People also tend to interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and illusory correlation (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations). Confirmation biases contribute to overconfidence in personal beliefs and can maintain or strengthen beliefs in the face of contrary evidence. Poor decisions due to these biases have been found in political and organizational contexts.[35][36]

Framing

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Framing involves the social construction of social phenomena by mass media sources, political or social movements, political leaders, and so on. It is an influence over how people organize, perceive, and communicate about reality.[37] It can be positive or negative, depending on the audience and what kind of information is being presented. For political purposes, framing often presents facts in such a way that implicates a problem that is in need of a solution. Members of political parties attempt to frame issues in a way that makes a solution favoring their own political leaning appear as the most appropriate course of action for the situation at hand.[38] As understood in social theory, framing is a schema of interpretation, a collection of anecdotes and stereotypes, that individuals rely on to understand and respond to events.[39] People use filters to make sense of the world, the choices they then make are influenced by their creation of a frame.

Cultural bias is the related phenomenon of interpreting and judging phenomena by standards inherent to one's own culture. Numerous such biases exist, concerning cultural norms for color, location of body parts, mate selection, concepts of justice, linguistic and logical validity, acceptability of evidence, and taboos. Ordinary people may tend to imagine other people as basically the same, not significantly more or less valuable, probably attached emotionally to different groups and different land.

Halo effect and horn effect

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The halo effect and the horn effect are when an observer's overall impression of a person, organization, brand, or product influences their feelings about specifics of that entity's character or properties.[40][41][42]

The name halo effect is based on the concept of the saint's halo, and is a specific type of confirmation bias, wherein positive sentiments in one area cause questionable or unknown characteristics to be seen positively. If the observer likes one aspect of something, they will have a positive predisposition toward everything about it.[43][44][45][46] A person's appearance has been found to produce a halo effect.[47] The halo effect is also present in the field of brand marketing, affecting perception of companies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs).[48][49][50][51][52][53][54]

The opposite of the halo is the horn effect, when "individuals believe (that negative) traits are inter-connected."[55] The term horn effect refers to Devil's horns.[citation needed] It works in a negative direction: if the observer dislikes one aspect of something, they will have a negative predisposition towards other aspects.[56]

Self-serving bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Self-serving bias is the tendency for cognitive or perceptual processes to be distorted by the individual's need to maintain and enhance self-esteem.[57] It is the propensity to credit accomplishment to our own capacities and endeavors, yet attribute failure to outside factors,[58] to dismiss the legitimacy of negative criticism, concentrate on positive qualities and accomplishments yet disregard flaws and failures. Studies have demonstrated that this bias can affect behavior in the workplace,[59] in interpersonal relationships,[60] playing sports,[61] and in consumer decisions.[62]

Status quo bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Status quo bias is an emotional bias; a preference for the current state of affairs. The current baseline (or status quo) is taken as a reference point, and any change from that baseline is perceived as a loss. Status quo bias should be distinguished from a rational preference for the status quo ante, as when the current state of affairs is objectively superior to the available alternatives, or when imperfect information is a significant problem. A large body of evidence, however, shows that status quo bias frequently affects human decision-making.[63]

Conflicts of interest

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". A conflict of interest is when a person or association has intersecting interests (financial, personal, etc.) which could potentially corrupt. The potential conflict is autonomous of actual improper actions, it can be found and intentionally defused before corruption, or the appearance of corruption, happens. "A conflict of interest is a set of circumstances that creates a risk that professional judgement or actions regarding a primary interest will be unduly influenced by a secondary interest."[64] It exists if the circumstances are sensibly accepted to present a hazard that choices made may be unduly affected by auxiliary interests.[65]

Corruption

A conflict of interest arises when a decision-maker participates in a corrupt act that seeks to influence the outcome in favor of a specific individual, organization, or entity in a decision-making process.[66] For example, attempts to solicit a bribe or kickback in exchange for favoring a party creates a conflict of interest.[67] A perceived conflict of interest may also arise in an individual who is offered such a payment, even if it is declined, particularly in situations where the attempt to bribe is not reported.[68]

Laws restricting whether a monetary transaction is appropriate can differ between jurisdictions based upon their criminal laws. For example, some nations criminalize the receipt of political campaign contributions in the form of cash, while other nations permit cash donations provided that donors otherwise adhere to election law.[citation needed]

Favoritism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Favoritism, sometimes known as in-group favoritism, or in-group bias, refers to a pattern of favoring members of one's in-group over out-group members. This can be expressed in evaluation of others, in allocation of resources, and in many other ways.[69][70] This has been researched by psychologists, especially social psychologists, and linked to group conflict and prejudice. Cronyism is favoritism of long-standing friends, especially by appointing them to positions of authority, regardless of their qualifications.[71] Nepotism is favoritism granted to relatives.[72][73][74][75]

Lobbying

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Box offered by tobacco lobbyists to Dutch Member of the European Parliament Kartika Liotard in September 2013

Lobbying is the attempt to influence choices made by administrators, frequently lawmakers or individuals from administrative agencies.[76][77][78] Lobbyists may be among a legislator's constituencies, or not; they may engage in lobbying as a business, or not. Lobbying is often spoken of with contempt, the implication is that people with inordinate socioeconomic power are corrupting the law in order to serve their own interests. When people who have a duty to act on behalf of others, such as elected officials with a duty to serve their constituents' interests or more broadly the common good, stand to benefit by shaping the law to serve the interests of some private parties, there is a conflict of interest. This can lead to all sides in a debate looking to sway the issue by means of lobbyists.

Regulatory issues

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Self-regulation is the process whereby an organization monitors its own adherence to legal, ethical, or safety standards, rather than have an outside, independent agency such as a third party entity monitor and enforce those standards.[79] Self-regulation of any group can create a conflict of interest. If any organization, such as a corporation or government bureaucracy, is asked to eliminate unethical behavior within their own group, it may be in their interest in the short run to eliminate the appearance of unethical behavior, rather than the behavior itself.

Regulatory capture is a form of political corruption that can occur when a regulatory agency, created to act in the public interest, instead advances the commercial or political concerns of special interest groups that dominate the industry or sector it is charged with regulating.[80][81] Regulatory capture occurs because groups or individuals with a high-stakes interest in the outcome of policy or regulatory decisions can be expected to focus their resources and energies in attempting to gain the policy outcomes they prefer, while members of the public, each with only a tiny individual stake in the outcome, will ignore it altogether.[82] Regulatory capture is a risk to which a regulatory agency is exposed by its very nature.[83][84]

Shilling

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Shilling is deliberately giving spectators the feeling that one is an energetic autonomous client of a vendor for whom one is working. The effectiveness of shilling relies on crowd psychology to encourage other onlookers or audience members to purchase the goods or services (or accept the ideas being marketed). Shilling is illegal in some places, but legal in others.[85] An example of shilling is paid reviews that give the impression of being autonomous opinions.

Statistical biases

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Statistical bias is a systematic tendency in the process of data collection, which results in lopsided, misleading results. This can occur in any of a number of ways, in the way the sample is selected, or in the way data are collected.[86] It is a property of a statistical technique or of its results whereby the expected value of the results differs from the true underlying quantitative parameter being estimated.

Forecast bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". A forecast bias is when there are consistent differences between results and the forecasts of those quantities; that is: forecasts may have an overall tendency to be too high or too low.

Observer-expectancy effect

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". The observer-expectancy effect is when a researcher's expectations cause them to subconsciously influence the people participating in an experiment. It is usually controlled using a double-blind system, and was an important reason for the development of double-blind experiments.

Reporting bias and social desirability bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In epidemiology and empirical research, reporting bias is defined as "selective revealing or suppression of information" of undesirable behavior by subjects[87] or researchers.[88][89] It refers to a tendency to under-report unexpected or undesirable experimental results, while being more trusting of expected or desirable results. This can propagate, as each instance reinforces the status quo, and later experimenters justify their own reporting bias by observing that previous experimenters reported different results.

Social desirability bias is a bias within social science research where survey respondents can tend to answer questions in a manner that will be viewed positively by others.[90] It can take the form of over-reporting laudable behavior, or under-reporting undesirable behavior. This bias interferes with the interpretation of average tendencies as well as individual differences. The inclination represents a major issue with self-report questionnaires; of special concern are self-reports of abilities, personalities, sexual behavior, and drug use.[90]

Selection bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Sampling is supposed to collect of a representative sample of a population.

Selection bias is the conscious or unconscious bias introduced into a study by the way individuals, groups or data are selected for analysis, if such a way means that true randomization is not achieved, thereby ensuring that the sample obtained is not representative of the population intended to be analyzed.[91] This results in a sample that may be significantly different from the overall population.

Prejudices

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Bias and prejudice are usually considered to be closely related.[92] Prejudice is prejudgment, or forming an opinion before becoming aware of the relevant facts of a case. The word is often used to refer to preconceived, usually unfavorable, judgments toward people or a person because of gender, political opinion, social class, age, disability, religion, sexuality, race/ethnicity, language, nationality, or other personal characteristics. Prejudice can also refer to unfounded beliefs[93] and may include "any unreasonable attitude that is unusually resistant to rational influence".[94]

Ageism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Ageism is the stereotyping and/or discrimination against individuals or groups on the basis of their age. It can be used in reference to prejudicial attitudes towards older people, or towards younger people.

Classism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Classism is discrimination on the basis of social class. It includes attitudes that benefit the upper class at the expense of the lower class, or vice versa.[95]

Lookism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Lookism is stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination on the basis of physical attractiveness, or more generally to people whose appearance matches cultural preferences.[96][97][98] Many people make automatic judgments of others based on their physical appearance that influence how they respond to those people.[99][100]

Racism[101][102][103][104][105] and Sexism

Template:Excerpt

Contextual biases

Biases in academia

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Academic bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Academic bias is the bias or perceived bias of scholars allowing their beliefs to shape their research and the scientific community. Claims of bias are often linked to claims by conservatives of pervasive bias against political conservatives and religious Christians.[106] Some have argued that these claims are based upon anecdotal evidence which would not reliably indicate systematic bias,[107][108][109] and have suggested that this divide is due to self-selection of conservatives choosing not to pursue academic careers.[107][110] There is some evidence that perception of classroom bias may be rooted in issues of sexuality, race, class and sex as much or more than in religion.[111][112]

Experimenter bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In science research, experimenter bias occurs when experimenter expectancies regarding study results bias the research outcome.[113] Examples of experimenter bias include conscious or unconscious influences on subject behavior including creation of demand characteristics that influence subjects, and altered or selective recording of experimental results themselves.[114] It can also involve asking leading probes and not neutrally redirecting the subject back to the task when they ask for validation or questions.[115]

Funding bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Funding bias refers to the tendency of a scientific study to support the interests of the study's financial sponsor. This phenomenon is recognized sufficiently that researchers undertake studies to examine bias in past published studies.[116] It can be caused by any or all of: a conscious or subconscious sense of obligation of researchers towards their employers,[117] misconduct or malpractice,[118] publication bias,[118][119][120][121] or reporting bias.[122]

Full text on net bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Full text on net (or FUTON) bias is a tendency of scholars to cite academic journals with open access—that is, journals that make their full text available on the internet without charge—in their own writing as compared with toll access publications. Scholars can more easily discover and access articles that have their full text on the internet, which increases authors' likelihood of reading, quoting, and citing these articles, this may increase the impact factor of open access journals relative to journals without open access.[123][124][125][126][127][128]

The related bias, no abstract available bias (NAA bias) is scholars' tendency to cite journal articles that have an abstract available online more readily than articles that do not.[123][128]

Publication bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Publication bias is a type of bias with regard to what academic research is likely to be published because of a tendency among researchers and journal editors to prefer some outcomes rather than others (e.g., results showing a significant finding), which leads to a problematic bias in the published literature.[129] This can propagate further as literature reviews of claims about support for a hypothesis will themselves be biased if the original literature is contaminated by publication bias.[130] Studies with significant results often do not appear to be superior to studies with a null result with respect to quality of design.[131] However, statistically significant results have been shown to be three times more likely to be published compared to papers with null results.[132]

Biases in law enforcement

Driving while black

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Driving while black refers to the racial profiling of African American drivers. The phrase implies that a motorist might be pulled over by a police officer, questioned, and searched, because of a racial bias.[133][134]

Racial profiling

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Racial profiling, or ethnic profiling, is the act of suspecting or targeting a person of a certain race on the basis of racially observed characteristics or behavior, rather than on individual suspicion.[135][136] Racial profiling is commonly referred to regarding its use by law enforcement, and its leading to discrimination against minorities.

Victim blaming

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Victim blaming occurs when the victim of a wrongful act is held at fault for the harm that befell them.[137] The study of victimology seeks to mitigate the perception of victims as responsible.[138]

Biases in media

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Media bias is the bias or perceived bias of journalists and news producers within the mass media in the selection of events, the stories that are reported, and how they are covered. The term generally implies a pervasive or widespread bias violating the standards of journalism, rather than the perspective of an individual journalist or article.[139] The level of media bias in different nations is debated. There are also watchdog groups that report on media bias.

Practical limitations to media neutrality include the inability of journalists to report all available stories and facts, the requirement that selected facts be linked into a coherent narrative, government influence including overt and covert censorship,[140] the influence of the owners of the news source, concentration of media ownership, the selection of staff, the preferences of an intended audience, and pressure from advertisers.

Bias has been a feature of the mass media since its birth with the invention of the printing press. The expense of early printing equipment restricted media production to a limited number of people. Historians have found that publishers often served the interests of powerful social groups.[141]

Agenda setting

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Agenda setting describes the capacity of the media to focus on particular stories, if a news item is covered frequently and prominently, the audience will regard the issue as more important. That is, its salience will increase.[142]

Gatekeeping

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Gatekeeping is the way in which information and news are filtered to the public, by each person or corporation along the way. It is the "process of culling and crafting countless bits of information into the limited number of messages that reach people every day, and it is the center of the media's role in modern public life. [...] This process determines not only which information is selected, but also what the content and nature of the messages, such as news, will be."[143]

Sensationalism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Sensationalism is when events and topics in news stories and pieces are overhyped to present skewed impressions of events, which may cause a misrepresentation of the truth of a story.[144] Sensationalism may involve reporting about insignificant matters and events, or the presentation of newsworthy topics in a trivial or tabloid manner contrary to the standards of professional journalism.[145][146]

Other contexts

Educational bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Bias in education refers to real or perceived bias in the educational system. The content of school textbooks is often the issue of debate, as their target audience is young people, and the term "whitewashing" is used to refer to selective removal of critical or damaging evidence or comment.[147][148][149] Religious bias in textbooks is observed in countries where religion plays a dominant role. There can be many forms of educational bias. Some overlooked aspects, occurring especially with the pedagogical circles of public and private schools—sources that are unrelated to fiduciary or mercantile impoverishment which may be unduly magnified—include teacher bias as well as a general bias against women who are going into STEM research.[150][151]

Inductive bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Inductive bias occurs within the field of machine learning. In machine learning one seeks to develop algorithms that are able to learn to anticipate a particular output. To accomplish this, the learning algorithm is given training cases that show the expected connection. Then the learner is tested with new examples. Without further assumptions, this problem cannot be solved exactly as unknown situations may not be predictable.[152][153] The inductive bias of the learning algorithm is the set of assumptions that the learner uses to predict outputs given inputs that it has not encountered.[152] It may bias the learner towards the correct solution, the incorrect, or be correct some of the time. A classical example of an inductive bias is Occam's Razor, which assumes that the simplest consistent hypothesis is the best.

Insider trading

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". Insider trading is the trading of a public company's stock or other securities (such as bonds or stock options) by individuals with access to non-public information about the company. In various countries, trading based on insider information is illegal because it is seen as unfair to other investors who do not have access to the information as the investor with insider information could potentially make far larger profits that a typical investor could make.

Match fixing

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote". In organized sports, match fixing occurs when a match is played to a completely or partially pre-determined result, violating the rules of the game and often the law.[154] There is a variety of reasons for this, but the most common is in exchange for a payoff from gamblers. Players might also intentionally perform poorly to get an advantage in the future (such as a better draft pick, or an easier opponent in a playoff), or to rig a handicap system. Match-fixing generally refers to fixing the final result of the game. Another form of match-fixing, known as spot-fixing, involves fixing small events within a match which can be gambled upon, but which are unlikely to prove decisive in determining the final result of the game.

Implicit bias

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".An implicit bias, or implicit stereotype, is the unconscious attribution of particular qualities to a member of a certain social group.[155]

Implicit stereotypes are shaped by experience and based on learned associations between particular qualities and social categories, including race and/or gender. Individuals' perceptions and behaviors can be influenced by the implicit stereotypes they hold, even if they are unaware/unintentionally hold such stereotypes. Implicit bias is an aspect of implicit social cognition: the phenomenon that perceptions, attitudes, and stereotypes operate without conscious intention. For example, researchers may have implicit bias when designing survey questions and as a result, the questions do not produce accurate results or fail to encourage survey participation.[115] The existence of implicit bias is supported by a variety of scientific articles in psychological literature. Implicit stereotype was first defined by psychologists Mahzarin Banaji and Anthony Greenwald in 1995.

See also

Lua error in mw.title.lua at line 404: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal'). Script error: No such module "Template wrapper".

References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Steinbock, Bonnie (1978). "Speciesism and the Idea of Equality". Philosophy. 53 (204): 247–256. doi:10.1017/S0031819100016582. S2CID 170331649.
  2. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Welsh, Matthew; Begg, Steve (2016). "What have we learned? Insights from a decade of bias research". The APPEA Journal. 56 (1): 435. doi:10.1071/aj15032. ISSN 1326-4966.
  3. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Online Etymology Dictionary, Bias". Archived from the original on 26 August 2018. Retrieved 26 Aug 2018.
  4. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Westcott, Sir Abell (1948). The Shipwright's Trade. University Press. ISBN 9781001385709. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  5. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Definition of Cognitive Bias". Chegg. Retrieved 1 September 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  6. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Haselton, M. G.; Nettle, D. & Andrews, P. W. (2005). The evolution of cognitive bias. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc. pp. 724–746.
  7. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bless, H.; Fiedler, K. & Strack, F. (2004). Social cognition: How individuals construct social reality. Hove and New York: Psychology Press. p. 2.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  8. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bless, H.; Fiedler, K. & Strack, F. (2004). Social cognition: How individuals construct social reality. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  9. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. (1972). "Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness". Cognitive Psychology. 3 (3): 430–454. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3.
  10. ^ Baron, J. (2007). Thinking and Deciding (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  11. ^ Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
  12. ^ For instance: Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gigerenzer, G. & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). "Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality" (PDF). Psychological Review. 103 (4): 650–669. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.174.4404. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650. hdl:21.11116/0000-0000-B771-2. PMID 8888650. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-09-22.
  13. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). "Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases". Science. 185 (4157): 1124–1131. Bibcode:1974Sci...185.1124T. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. PMID 17835457. S2CID 143452957. Archived from the original on September 24, 2017.
  14. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Haselton, M. G.; Nettle, D. & Andrews, P. W. (2005). The evolution of cognitive bias. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology: Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc. pp. 724–746.
  15. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bless, H.; Fiedler, K. & Strack, F. (2004). Social cognition: How individuals construct social reality. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
  16. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Welsh, Matthew B.; Delfabbro, Paul H.; Burns, Nicholas R.; Begg, Steve H. (2014). "Individual differences in anchoring: Traits and experience". Learning and Individual Differences. 29: 131–140. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.002. ISSN 1041-6080.
  17. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Anchoring bias in decision-making". Science Daily. Archived from the original on September 29, 2015. Retrieved September 29, 2015.
  18. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Anchoring Definition". Investopedia. Archived from the original on October 23, 2017. Retrieved September 29, 2015.
  19. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. (1974). "Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases" (PDF). Science. 185 (4157): 1124–1131. Bibcode:1974Sci...185.1124T. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. PMID 17835457. S2CID 143452957. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-08-17.
  20. ^ Edward Teach, "Avoiding Decision Traps Script error: No such module "webarchive".", CFO (1 June 2004). Retrieved 29 May 2007.
  21. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Shermer, Michael (2008). "Patternicity: Finding Meaningful Patterns in Meaningless Noise". Scientific American. 299 (6): 48. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1208-48. PMID 19143444.
  22. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.GrrlScientist (29 September 2010). "Michael Shermer: The pattern behind self-deception". Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 26 September 2015. Retrieved 2011-06-29.
  23. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Why Do We Need a Belief in God with Michael Shermer". YouTube. 2011-08-19. Archived from the original on 2016-03-14.
  24. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Apophenia & Illusory Correlation « Paul Xavier Waterstone". Waterstone.wordpress.com. 2007-05-24. Archived from the original on 2014-12-17. Retrieved 2011-06-29.
  25. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bustamante, Patricio; Yao, Fay; Bustamante, Daniela (2010). "The worship to the mountains: a study of the creation myths of the chinese culture". Archived from the original on 2015-09-24.
  26. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bustamante, Patricio; Yao, Fay; Bustamante, Daniela (2010). "Search for meanings: from pleistocene art to the worship of the mountains in early China. Methodological tools for Mimesis". Archived from the original on 2016-03-04.
  27. ^ Heider, F. (1958). "The psychology of interpersonal relations", New York: Wiley, 322 p.
  28. ^ Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
  29. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Abramson, L.Y.; Seligman, M.E.; Teasdale, J.D. (1978). "Learned helplessness in humans: Critique and reformulation". Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 87 (1): 49–74. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49. PMID 649856. S2CID 2845204.
  30. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Funder, D.C. (1987). "Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment" (PDF). Psychological Bulletin. 101 (1): 75–90. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.75. PMID 3562704. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2008-05-16.
  31. ^ Nisbett, R.E. & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  32. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Rewind: Watch the Media Spend Two Years Hyping a Now-Debunked Story". Grabien. Archived from the original on 29 March 2019. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
  33. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Zweig, Jason (November 19, 2009). "How to Ignore the Yes-Man in Your Head". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on February 14, 2015. Retrieved 2010-06-13.
  34. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Plous, Scott (1993). The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. McGraw-Hill Education. pp. 233. ISBN 9780070504776.
  35. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Nickerson, Raymond S. (June 1998). "Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises". Review of General Psychology. 2 (2): 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175. S2CID 8508954.
  36. ^ Tuchman, Barbara (1984). The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam. New York: Knopf.
  37. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Druckman, J.N. (2001). "The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence". Political Behavior. 23 (3): 225–256. doi:10.1023/A:1015006907312. S2CID 10584001.
  38. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.van der Pas, D. (2014). "Making Hay While the Sun Shines: Do Parties Only Respond to Media Attention When The Framing is Right?". Journal of Press/Politics. 19 (1): 42–65. doi:10.1177/1940161213508207. S2CID 220652512.
  39. ^ Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  40. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Long-Crowell, Erin. "The Halo Effect: Definition, Advantages & Disadvantages". Psychology 104: Social Psychology. study.com. Archived from the original on October 1, 2015. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
  41. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Halo Effect". Investopedia. Archived from the original on November 6, 2017. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
  42. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Thorndike, EL (1920). "A constant error in psychological ratings". Journal of Applied Psychology. 4 (1): 25–29. Bibcode:1920JApPs...4...25T. doi:10.1037/h0071663. Archived from the original on 2019-07-13. Retrieved 2019-12-20.
  43. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Horns and halo effect". The Free Dictionary. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
  44. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Nisbett, Richard E; Wilson, Timothy D (1977). "The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments" (PDF). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 35 (4): 250–56. Bibcode:1977JPSP...35..250N. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250. hdl:2027.42/92158. ISSN 1939-1315. S2CID 17867385. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  45. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Glennie, Jonathan (3 May 2011). "Hugo Chávez's reverse-halo effect". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 16 August 2017.
  46. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Ostrove, Nancy; Sigall, Harold (1975). "Beautiful but Dangerous: Effects of Offender Attractiveness and Nature of the Crime on Juridic Judgment". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 31 (3): 410–14. doi:10.1037/h0076472. Archived from the original on 2016-07-01.
  47. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Wade, T Joel; DiMaria, Cristina (2003). "Weight Halo Effects: Individual Differences in Perceived Life Success as a Function of Women's Race and Weight". Sex Roles. 48 (9/10): 461–465. doi:10.1023/A:1023582629538. S2CID 141143275.
  48. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Apple shares surfs on big profits". BBC News. 13 January 2005. Archived from the original on 18 November 2006. Retrieved 18 January 2012.
  49. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Chandon, Pierre; Wansink, Brian (2007). "The Biasing Health Halos of Fast-Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimate and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions". Journal of Consumer Research. 34 (3): 301–14. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.173.2288. doi:10.1086/519499. S2CID 3881018.
  50. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Jeffray, Nathan (24 June 2010). "Interview: Gerald Steinberg". The Jewish Chronicle. Archived from the original on 1 July 2010.
  51. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Balanson, Naftali (8 October 2008). "The 'halo effect' shields NGOs from media scrutiny". The Jerusalem Post.
  52. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Jones, Nancy. "Corporate Donors". Ronald House Durham. Archived from the original on 3 December 2013. Retrieved 26 November 2013.
  53. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Coombs, Timothy W; Holladay, Sherry J (2006). "Unpacking the halo effect: reputation and crisis management". Journal of Communication Management. 10 (2): 123–37. doi:10.1108/13632540610664698.
  54. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Klein, Jill; Dawar, Niraj (2004). "Evaluations in a Product-Harm Crisis". International Journal of Research in Marketing. 21 (3): 203–17. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.003.
  55. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Mental Model: Horns Effect and Halo Effect". www.joshuakennon.com. 12 November 2011. Archived from the original on 2018-06-25. Retrieved 2017-09-08.
  56. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."The Halo and Horns Effects [Rating Errors]". Right Attitudes. 2010-05-01. Archived from the original on 2017-08-23. Retrieved 2017-09-08.
  57. ^ Myers, D.G. (2015). Exploring Social Psychology, 7th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
  58. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Campbell, W.K.; Sedikides, C. (1999). "Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration". Review of General Psychology. 3: 23–43. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.3.1.23. S2CID 144756539.
  59. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Pal, G.C. (2007). "Is there a universal self-serving attribution bias?". Psychological Studies. 52 (1): 85–89.
  60. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Campbell, W. Keith; Sedikides, Constantine; Reeder, Glenn D.; Elliot, Andrew J. (2000). "Among friends? An examination of friendship and the self-serving bias". British Journal of Social Psychology. 39 (2): 229–239. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.559.7984. doi:10.1348/014466600164444. PMID 10907097.
  61. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.De Michele, P.; Gansneder, B.; Solomon, G. (1998). "Success and failure attributions of wrestlers: Further Evidence of the Self-Serving Bias". Journal of Sport Behavior. 21 (3): 242.
  62. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Moon, Youngme (2003). "Don't Blame the Computer: When Self-Disclosure Moderates the Self-Serving Bias". Journal of Consumer Psychology. 13 (1): 125–137. doi:10.1207/153276603768344843 (inactive 4 December 2025).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2025 (link)
  63. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Samuelson, William; Zeckhauser, Richard (1988). "Status quo bias in decision making". Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1 (1): 7–59. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.632.3193. doi:10.1007/bf00055564. ISSN 0895-5646. S2CID 5641133.
  64. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Lo, Bernard; Field, Marilyn J. (2009). Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-13188-9.
  65. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Cain, D.M.; Detsky, A.S. (2008). "Everyone's a Little Bit Biased (Even Physicians)". JAMA. 299 (24): 2893–289. doi:10.1001/jama.299.24.2893. PMID 18577735.
  66. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Rose, Cecily (28 February 2014). "Corruption and conflicts of interests in the United Kingdom". Corruption and Conflicts of Interest: 150–166. doi:10.4337/9781781009352.00018. ISBN 978-1-78100-935-2.
  67. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Jacobsson, Katarina (June 2006). "'A Token of Gratitude'? A Morally Ambiguous Case of Bribery". Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention. 7 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1080/14043850600643462.
  68. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Pringle, Sam (2021). "SIB Guidance on Conflicts of Interest" (PDF). The Strategic Investment Board. Retrieved 7 February 2025.
  69. ^ Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. (2010). Social psychology. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  70. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Taylor, Donald M.; Doria, Janet R. (April 1981). "Self-serving and group-serving bias in attribution". Journal of Social Psychology. 113 (2): 201–211. doi:10.1080/00224545.1981.9924371. ISSN 0022-4545.
  71. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Cronyism". The Free Dictionary. Retrieved October 1, 2015.
  72. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Nepotism". The Free Dictionary. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  73. ^ "Nepotism." Script error: No such module "webarchive". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 20 June 2013.
  74. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."In Praise of Nepotism: A Natural History". Adam Bellow Booknotes interview transcript. Archived from the original on 26 September 2010. Retrieved 10 September 2013.
  75. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Article Nepotism". New Catholic Dictionary. Archived from the original on February 24, 2007. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
  76. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."lobbying". Merriam-Webster Dictionary.Com. Archived from the original on 2015-09-17.
  77. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."lobbying". BBC News. London. 1 October 2008. Archived from the original on 3 January 2009. Retrieved 24 March 2010.
  78. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."lobbyist". Random House Unabridged Dictionary. 2006. Archived from the original on 2015-10-02.
  79. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Self-regulation dictionary definition". YourDictionary. Archived from the original on October 5, 2015. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  80. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Regulatory Capture Definition". Investopedia. Archived from the original on October 3, 2015. Retrieved October 2, 2015.
  81. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Regulatory Capture 101". The Wall Street Journal. 2014-10-06. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 2017-09-03. Retrieved 2017-09-08.
  82. ^ Timothy B. Lee, "Entangling the Web" Script error: No such module "webarchive". The New York Times (August 3, 2006). Retrieved April 1, 2011
  83. ^ Gary Adams, Sharon Hayes, Stuart Weierter and John Boyd, "Regulatory Capture: Managing the Risk" Script error: No such module "webarchive". ICE Australia, International Conferences and Events (PDF) (October 24, 2007). Retrieved April 14, 2011
  84. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hamilton, Alexander. "Small is beautiful, at least in high-income democracies: the distribution of policy-making responsibility, electoral accountability, and incentives for rent extraction" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-10-05. Retrieved 2013-05-24., World Bank.
  85. ^ FTC v. Greeting Cards of America, Inc. et al - USA (S.D. Fla. Script error: No such module "auto date formatter".), Text.
  86. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Rumsey, Deborah J. "HOW TO IDENTIFY STATISTICAL BIAS". Dummies.com. Archived from the original on 2018-02-14. Retrieved 2018-08-24.
  87. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Porta, Miquel, ed. (5 June 2008). A Dictionary of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press. p. 275. ISBN 978-0-19-157844-1. Archived from the original on 16 December 2016. Retrieved 27 March 2013.
  88. ^ Green S, Higgins S, editors: Glossary. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5. Script error: No such module "webarchive".
  89. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McGauran, N; Wieseler, B; Kreis, J; Schüler, YB; Kölsch, H; Kaiser, T (2010). "Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review" (PDF). Trials. 11 37. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-37. PMC 2867979. PMID 20388211. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-01-08.
  90. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Social Desirability Bias". psychologyconcepts.com. 13 November 2011. Archived from the original on August 31, 2015. Retrieved September 1, 2015.
  91. ^ Dictionary of Cancer Terms → selection bias Script error: No such module "webarchive".. Retrieved on September 23, 2009.
  92. ^ "bias ...; prejudice", The New Merriam–Webster Dictionary, Template:ISBN
  93. ^ William James wrote: "A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices." Quotable Quotes – Courtesy of The Freeman Institute Script error: No such module "webarchive".
  94. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Rosnow, Ralph L. (March 1972). "Poultry and Prejudice". Psychologist Today. 5 (10): 53–6.
  95. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Kadi, Joanna (1996). Thinking Class. U.S.: South End Press. ISBN 978-0-89608-548-0.
  96. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Lookism". The Free Dictionary. Retrieved September 30, 2015.
  97. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Lookism". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. Bartleby.com. 2000. Archived from the original on December 5, 2008.
  98. ^ Farrell, Warren (2005). Why Men Earn More: The Startling Truth About the Pay Gap -- And What Women Can Do About It. AMACOM, Template:ISBN p. 193
  99. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Eagly, Alice; Ashmore, Richard; Makhijani, Mona G.; Longo, Laura C. (1991). "What is beautiful is good, but". Psychological Bulletin. 110: 109–128. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109.
  100. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Rhodes, Gillian; Simmons, Leigh; Peters, Marianne (2005). "Attractiveness and Sexual Behavior: Does Attractiveness Enhance Mating Success?". Evolution and Human Behavior. 26 (2): 186–201. Bibcode:2005EHumB..26..186R. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.014.
  101. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.SCHMID, W. THOMAS (April 1996). "The Definition of Racism". Journal of Applied Philosophy. 13 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.1996.tb00147.x.
  102. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Oxford English Dictionary, Racism". Archived from the original on 2015-08-29. Retrieved 24 Aug 2015. Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior:
  103. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Newman, D. M. (2012). Sociology : exploring the architecture of everyday life (9th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE. p. 405. ISBN 978-1-4129-8729-5. racism: Belief that humans are subdivided into distinct groups that are different in their social behavior and innate capacities and that can be ranked as superior or inferior.
  104. ^ Racism Script error: No such module "webarchive". Oxford Dictionaries
  105. ^ "Racism" in R. Schefer. 2008 Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity and Society. SAGE. p. 1113
  106. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hibbing, John D (2014), "Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37 (3): 297–350, doi:10.1017/S0140525X13001192, hdl:1911/77132, ISSN 1939-1323, PMID 24970428, S2CID 54466287, archived from the original on 2019-12-21, retrieved 2019-09-02
  107. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Ames, Barry; Barker, David C; Bonneau, Chris W; Carman, Christopher J (2005), "Hide the Republicans, the Christians, and the Women: A Response to "Politics and Professional Advancement Among College Faculty"", The Forum, 3 (2) 0000102202154088841075, doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1075, ISSN 1540-8884, S2CID 14322810
  108. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Lee, John (November 2006), The "Faculty Bias" Studies: Science or Propaganda (PDF), American Federation of Teachers, archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-17, retrieved 2014-01-24
  109. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Giroux, Henry A. (2006), "Academic Freedom Under Fire: The Case for Critical Pedagogy", College Literature, 33 (4): 1–42, doi:10.1353/lit.2006.0051, ISSN 1542-4286, S2CID 143909432
  110. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gross, Neil (9 April 2013), Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care?, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, ISBN 978-0-674-07448-4, archived from the original on 27 June 2014, retrieved 2014-01-24
  111. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Boysen, Guy A; Vogel, David L; Cope, Marissa A; Hubbard, Asale (2009), "Incidents Of Bias in College Classrooms: Instructor and Student Perceptions", Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 2 (4): 219–231, doi:10.1037/a0017538, ISSN 1938-8934, S2CID 11334709
  112. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Brady, K. L.; Eisler, R. M. (1995). "Gender Bias in the College Classroom: A Critical Review of the Literature and Implications for Future Research". Journal of Research and Development in Education. 29 (1): 9–19.
  113. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Sackett, D. L. (1979). "Bias in analytic research". Journal of Chronic Diseases. 32 (1–2): 51–63. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2. PMID 447779.
  114. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Barry H. Kantowitz; Henry L. Roediger, III; David G. Elmes (2009). Experimental Psychology. Cengage Learning. p. 371. ISBN 978-0-495-59533-5. Archived from the original on 1 January 2014. Retrieved 7 September 2013.
  115. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Geisen, Emily; Sha, Mandy; Roper, Farren (2024). Bias testing in market research: A framework to enable inclusive research design (published January 3, 2024). ISBN 979-8862902785.
  116. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Krimsky, Sheldon (2012). "Do Financial Conflicts of Interest Bias Research? An Inquiry into the "Funding Effect" Hypothesis" (PDF). Science, Technology, & Human Values. 38 (4): 566–587. doi:10.1177/0162243912456271. S2CID 42598982. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-17. Retrieved 2015-09-23.
  117. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Cialdini, Robert B (2008-08-08). Influence: Science and Practice (5th ed). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-205-60999-4.
  118. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.David Michaels (2008-07-15). "It's Not the Answers That Are Biased, It's the Questions". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2017-10-09.
  119. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Wilmshurst, Peter (2007). "Dishonesty in Medical Research" (PDF). The Medico-Legal Journal. 75 (Pt 1): 3–12. doi:10.1258/rsmmlj.75.1.3. PMID 17506338. S2CID 26915448. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-05-21.
  120. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Lexchin, Joel; Bero, Lisa A; Djulbegovic, Benjamin; Clark, Otavio (2003-05-31). "Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review". BMJ. 326 (7400): 1167–1170. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7400.1167. PMC 156458. PMID 12775614.
  121. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Anders Sandberg (2007-01-14). "Supping with the Devil". OvercomingBias. Archived from the original on 2015-09-23.
  122. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Types of Bias". Cochrane Bias Methods Group. 2009-06-19. Archived from the original on 2010-07-23. Retrieved 2010-08-04.
  123. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Murali, N. S.; Murali, H. R.; Auethavekiat, P.; Erwin, P. J.; Mandrekar, J. N.; Manek, N. J.; Ghosh, A. K. (2004). "Impact of FUTON and NAA bias on visibility of research". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 79 (8): 1001–1006. doi:10.4065/79.8.1001. PMID 15301326.
  124. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Ghosh, A. K.; Murali, N. S. (2003). "Online access to nephrology journals: The FUTON bias". Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation. 18 (9): 1943, author reply 1943. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfg247. PMID 12937253.
  125. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Mueller, P. S.; Murali, N. S.; Cha, S. S.; Erwin, P. J.; Ghosh, A. K. (2006). "The effect of online status on the impact factors of general internal medicine journals". The Netherlands Journal of Medicine. 64 (2): 39–44. PMID 16517987. Archived from the original on 2011-07-19.
  126. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Krieger, M. M.; Richter, R. R.; Austin, T. M. (2008). "An exploratory analysis of PubMed's free full-text limit on citation retrieval for clinical questions". Journal of the Medical Library Association. 96 (4): 351–355. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.96.4.010. PMC 2568849. PMID 18974812.
  127. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gilman, Isaac (2009). "Opening up the Evidence: Evidence-Based Practice and Open Access". Faculty Scholarship (PUL). Archived from the original on 2011-02-21. Retrieved 2015-09-02.
  128. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Wentz, R. (2002). "Visibility of research: FUTON bias". The Lancet. 360 (9341): 1256. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11264-5. PMID 12401287. S2CID 5084231.
  129. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Song, F.; Parekh, S.; Hooper, L.; Loke, Y. K.; Ryder, J.; Sutton, A. J.; Hing, C.; Kwok, C. S.; Pang, C.; Harvey, I. (2010). "Dissemination and publication of research findings: An updated review of related biases". Health Technology Assessment. 14 (8): iii, iix–xi, iix–193. doi:10.3310/hta14080. hdl:2381/16613. PMID 20181324.
  130. ^ H. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton and M. Borenstein. (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: prevention, assessment and adjustments. Wiley. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ.
  131. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Easterbrook, P. J.; Berlin, J. A.; Gopalan, R.; Matthews, D. R. (1991). "Publication bias in clinical research". Lancet. 337 (8746): 867–872. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90201-Y. PMID 1672966. S2CID 36570135.
  132. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Dickersin, K.; Chan, S.; Chalmers, T. C.; et al. (1987). "Publication bias and clinical trials". Controlled Clinical Trials. 8 (4): 343–353. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(87)90155-3. PMID 3442991.
  133. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Harris, D. (1999). "The stories, the statistics, and the law: Why 'Driving While Black' matters". 84 Minnesota Law Review. pp. 265–326. Archived from the original on May 15, 2007. Retrieved May 7, 2007.
  134. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gates, Henry L. (1995-10-16). "Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Black Man". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2017-03-14.
  135. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Profiling". Merriam-Webster's Collegiate® Dictionary, Eleventh Edition. 9 August 2023.
  136. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Warren, Patricia Y.; Farrell, Amy (2009). "The Environmental Context of Racial Profiling". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 623: 52–63. doi:10.1177/0002716208330485. JSTOR 40375886. S2CID 146368789.
  137. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Victim Blaming" (PDF). Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-03-25. Retrieved 2018-08-31.
  138. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Fox, K. A.; Cook, C. L. (2011). "Is Knowledge Power? The Effects of a Victimology Course on Victim Blaming". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 26 (17): 3407–3427. doi:10.1177/0886260511403752. PMID 21602202. S2CID 25378556.
  139. ^ Strategic Maneuvering and Media Bias in Political News Magazine Opinion Articles, Stefano Mario Rivolta, 7 June 2011
  140. ^ "10 Most Censored Countries" Script error: No such module "webarchive"., Committee to Protect Journalists, 2 May 2006
  141. ^ Ann Heinrichs, The Printing Press (Inventions That Shaped the World), p. 53, Franklin Watts, 2005, Template:ISBN, Template:ISBN
  142. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McCombs, M; Reynolds, A (2002). "News influence on our pictures of the world". Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research.
  143. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Shoemaker, Pamela J.; Vos, Tim P. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415981392.
  144. ^ "Issue Area: Sensationalism." Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting. Accessed June 2011.
  145. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Stephens, Mitchell (2007). A History of News. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-518991-9.
  146. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Thompson, John (June 22, 1999). "The Media and Modernity". In Mackay, Hugh; O'Sullivan, Tim (eds.). The Media Reader: Continuity and Transformation. Sage Publications Ltd. ISBN 978-0-7619-6250-2.
  147. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Sadker, David. "Seven Forms of Bias in Instructional Materials". sadker.org. Archived from the original on 21 October 2015. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
  148. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Strauss, Valerie (12 September 2014). "Proposed Texas textbooks are inaccurate, biased and politicized, new report finds". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 8 September 2015. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
  149. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Czitrom, Daniel (22 March 2010). "Texas school board whitewashes history". CNN. Archived from the original on 28 March 2015. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
  150. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."How to Get Your Ex Boyfriend Back – Tips to Win Back His Love and Get Him Back". www.americanmentalhealthfundation.org. Archived from the original on 2018-06-28. Retrieved 2017-09-08.
  151. ^ "Crisis Counseling with Children," Van Ornum and Murdock, 1990, NY: Crossroad/Continuum.
  152. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Mitchell, T. M. (1980). The need for biases in learning generalizations (Report). CBM-TR 5-110. New Brunswick, New Jersey, US: Rutgers University. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.19.5466.
  153. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gordon, Diana F.; Desjardins, Marie (1995). "Evaluation and Selection of Biases in Machine Learning". Machine Learning. 20 (1–2): 5–22. doi:10.1023/A:1022630017346.
  154. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.match-fixing. Oxford dictionaries. Archived from the original on August 31, 2015. Retrieved September 23, 2015.
  155. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Greenwald, A. G.; Banaji, M. R. (1995). "Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes". Psychological Review. 102 (1): 4–27. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.411.2919. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4. PMID 7878162. S2CID 8194189.

Script error: No such module "Sister project links". Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found.

Retrieved from "https://cosmopedia.co/index.php?title=Bias&oldid=26931"