Allioideae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Alliaceae)

Template:Short description Template:DMCA Script error: No such module "Automated taxobox".

Allioideae is a subfamily of monocot flowering plants in the family Amaryllidaceae, order Asparagales. It was formerly treated as a separate family, Alliaceae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The subfamily name is derived from the generic name of the type genus, Allium. It is composed of about 18 genera.

Description

The subfamily contains both well-known garden plants and weeds, such as Nothoscordum.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Taxonomy

File:Adanson Oignons.jpg
Michel Adanson's description of Cepae 1763

Page Template:Multiple image/styles.css has no content.

Original descriptions of Alliaceae

When Linnaeus formerly described the type genus Allium in his Species Plantarum in 1753,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. thirty species had this name. He placed Allium in a grouping he referred to as Hexandria monogynia (i.e. six stamens and one pistil)Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. containing 51 genera in all.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

In 1763, Michel Adanson, who proposed the concept of families of plants, included Allium and related genera as a grouping within LiliaceaeLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. as Section IV, Les Oignons (Onions), or Cepae in Latin.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. De Jussieu is officially recognised as the first formal establishment of the suprageneric grouping into families (Ordo) in 1789. In this system Allium was one of fourteen genera in Ordo VI, Asphodeles (Asphodeli), of the third class (Stamina epigyna) of Monocots.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

In 1786, the Allioideae were first described by their type genus as Alliaceae by Batsch.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. In 1797, after the appearance of the Jussieu system, this was validated by Borkhausen.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Jean Henri Jaume Saint-Hilaire (1805), who developed the concept of Amaryllidaceae, continued Jussieu's treatment of Allium under Asphodeli (which he considered synonymous with Adanson's Liliaceae and Jussieu's Asphodeli).Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. He placed Allium in an unnamed monotypic section of Asphodeli defined as Fleurs en ombelle, racine bulbeuse. Calice à six parties egales (umbellate flowers, bulbous, calyx of six equal parts).Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Subsequently, de Candolle reverted the family name back to Liliaceae from Asphodeli.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. He divided the Liliaceae into a series of Ordres, and the second ordre was named Asphodèles, based on Jussieus' family of that name,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. in which he placed Allium.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The term 'Alliaceae' then reappeared in its subfamilial form, Allieae, in Dumortier's Florula Belgica (1827),Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. with six genera.

The 'Alliaceae' have been treated as Allieae within the family Liliaceae (or Aspholecaceae, a partial synonym) by most authorities since. In 1830, Lindley, the first English systematist, considered Alliaceae[notes 2] to be part of the tribe Asphodeleae,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. separating them from the Liliaceae as he understood them. He also described the closely related Gilliesieae (p. 274), which with the Allieae would later migrate to Amaryllidaceae.By the time of his final work in 1846 he realised that the Liliaceae, which had expanded greatly were very diverse in circumscription with many subdivisions, and were already paraphyletic ("catch-all"). He absorbed Asphodeleae into this family and created a suborder of Scilleae, which he considered equivalent to Link's Allieae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

By the time of the next major British (though written in Latin) classification, that of Bentham and Hooker (1883), the Allieae had become one of 20 tribes within Liliaceae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The Allieae included Lindley's GilliesieaeLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. as one of its four subtribes.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Similarly in the German language literature, Engler's classification (1903) treated Allieae and Gilliesiae as tribes of subfamily Allioideae, within Liliaceae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Modern era

In the early 20th century, doubts were expressed about the placement of the alliaceous genera within Liliaceae, based solely on the position of the ovary. Lotsy was the first taxonomist to propose separating them, and in his system he describes Alliaceae and Gilliesiaceae as new and separate families from Liliaceae (1911).Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. This approach was later adopted by a number of other authorities, such as Dahlgren (1985)Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. and Rahn (1998).Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

In 1926, John Hutchinson moved the tribes Allieae and Gilliesieaes from Liliaceae to the Amaryllidaceae,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. although this was not universally adopted. Thus, Allieae were variously treated as either Liliaceae, Amaryllidaceae, or Alliaceae. Further examination of the heterogeneity of the Liliaceae by Huber (1969)Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. supported the removal of these two tribes, into Alliaceae and this family was treated as an independent entity from then onwards with the exception of CronquistLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. who reverted to a very broad concept of Liliaceae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

In 1985, Dahlgren, Clifford, and Yeo continuing the work of Huber, but with a more cladistic approach,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. defined the Alliaceae to include all of the genera that are now included in Allioideae (30 genera, 720 species), plus Agapanthus and a group of genera that are now placed in Themidaceae, or its equivalent, the subfamily Brodiaeoideae of Asparagaceae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. They divided Alliaceae into three subfamilies: Agapanthoideae,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Allioideae,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. and Gilliesioideae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Agapanthoideae consisted of two genera (Agapanthus and Tulbaghia). Allioideae contained two tribes, Brodiaeeae (ten genera) and a broadly defined Allieae, which they considered distinct enough to alternatively consider as subfamilies in their own right. Gilliesioideae was composed of about half of the genera now placed in Gilliesieae, the rest being assigned to Allieae.

Phylogenetic analyses

In 1996, a molecular phylogenetic study of the rbcL gene showed that Agapanthus was misplaced in Alliaceae, and the authors excluded it from the family.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. They also raised Brodiaeeae to family rank as Themidaceae. They reduced the tribe Allieae to two genera, Allium and Milula, and transferred the rest of Allieae to Gilliesieae. This is the circumscription which the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group accepted in the APG classification of 1998 and which later became known as Alliaceae sensu stricto.

In the APG II system of 2003, Alliaceae could be recognized sensu stricto or sensu lato, as mentioned above. Soon after the publication of APG II, the ICBN conserved the name Amaryllidaceae for the family that had been called Alliaceae sensu lato in APG II.

When the APG III system was published in 2009, the alternative circumscriptions were discontinued and Alliaceae was no longer recognized. Alliaceae sensu stricto became the subfamily Allioideae of Amaryllidaceae sensu lato.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Some botanists have not strictly followed the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group and have recognized the smaller version of Alliaceae at family rank.[2][3] Successive revisions of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) classification have changed the circumscription of the family. In the 1998 version, Alliaceae were a distinct family; in the 2003 version, combining the Alliaceae with the Agapanthaceae and the Amaryllidaceae sensu stricto was recommended but optional; in the 2009 version, only the broad circumscription of the Amaryllidaceae is allowed, with the Alliaceae reduced to a subfamily, Allioideae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Quite a few of the plants that were once included in family Alliaceae have been assigned to the subfamily Brodiaeoideae (rather than the subfamily Allioideae).Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

The largest genera are Allium (260–690 species), Nothoscordum (25), and Tulbaghia (22).[4] Some of the generic limits are not clear. Ipheion, Nothoscordum, and possibly others are not monophyletic.[5]

Subdivision

Allioideae is divided into four tribes: Allieae, Tulbaghieae, Gilliesieae and Leucocoryneae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The first three correspond to the three subfamilies under the older family Alliaceae (Alliodiae, Tulbaghioideae and Gilliesioideae). Leucocoryneae was added in 2014 by dividing Gilliesieae into two separate tribes, corresponding to the original tribes within Gilliesioideae, elevating Iphiae nom. nud. to tribe Leucocoryneae.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Allieae contains only one genus Allium (Milula is merged with Allium in the latest systems). Tulbaghieae contains two genera, Tulbaghia and Prototulbaghia. Gilliesieae and Leucocoryneae contain the remaining fifteen genera. Allieae is sister to a clade composed of Tulbaghieae and Gilliesieae.[6]

Allieae

It is characterised by simple or prolific bulbs, sometimes with lateral rhizomes. Leaf sheaths are long, tepals are free and the corona is absent. Spathe is formed from 2–5 bracts. The style is positioned apical relative to the ovary. The ovary usually has two, four or numerous ovules per locule in two longitudinal rows. It has one genus, Allium, and over 500 species. It is distributed over all the Northern hemisphere.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Gilliesieae

Characterised by simple or prolific bulbs, sometimes with lateral rhizomes. Leaf sheaths long, tepals more or less fused and corona absent. Spathe formed from 1–2 bracts. Style more or less gynobasic. Ovary usually has two ovules per locule, side by side. Floral symmetry zygomorphic, septal nectaries absent. Nine genera native to South America.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Leucocoryneae

Characterised by simple or prolific bulbs, sometimes with lateral rhizomes. Leaf sheaths long, tepals more or less fused and corona absent. Spathe formed from 1–2 bracts. Style more or less gynobasic. Ovary usually has two ovules per locule, side by side. Floral symmetry actinomorphic, septal nectaries present. Six genera and 42 species, and endemic to South America with the exception of two species of Nothoscordum.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Tulbaghieae

Characterised by corm-shaped bulb or rhizome. Leaf sheaths short. Flowers possess a corona, pseudocorona or a fleshy perigonal ring.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Two genera and about 25 species. Endemic to South Africa.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Genera

As of December 2014, the following eighteen genera are included in the Allioideae:[notes 3]

Allieae
Gilliesieae
Leucocoryneae
Tulbaghieae

Former genera

The genera Androstephium, Bessera, Bloomeria, Brodiaea, Dandya, Dichelostemma, Jaimehintonia, Milla, Muilla, Petronymphe, Triteleia, and Triteleiopsis are now treated in the family Themidaceae (alt. Asparagaceae subfam. Brodiaeoideae). Petronymphe has been restored to Themidaceae from AnthericaceaeLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. (now a segregate of Agavaceae).[9] Latace Phil. is included in Nothoscordum.

Phylogeny

Script error: No such module "Clade".

Distribution

Global distribution corresponds to the tribal structure, with the Allieae confined to the Northern hemisphere (North America, North Africa, Europe and Asia), Tulbaghieae to South Africa, Gilliesieae to South America, and Leucocoryneae to South America with the exception of two species of Nothoscordum (N. bivalve, N. gracile) which extend to southern North America.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Thus, fourteen of the total of 18 genera are endemic to temperate South America.[4]Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Uses

Some of the species of Allium are important food plants for example onions (Allium cepa), chives (A. schoenoprasum), garlic (A. sativum and A. scordoprasum), and leeks (A. porrum).[2] Species of Allium, Gilliesia, Ipheion, Leucocoryne, Nothoscordum, and Tulbaghia are cultivated as ornamentals.[10]

See also

Notes

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ While the name Alliaceae is generally attributed to Agardh, there is prior precedence for Batsch (Dispos. Gen. Pl. Jenens.: 50. 1786).Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. This was validated by Borkhausen (1797).Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Since suprageneric nomenclature officially commences on 4 Aug 1789 (Jussieu, Gen. Pl.) Alliaceae should be more correctly referenced as Alliaceae Batsch ex Borkh., Bot. Wörterb. 1: 15. 1797, nom. cons.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
  2. ^ Lindley attributed Alliaceae to Link rather than Dumortier, referencing Alliaceae Link Handb. I: 152 (1829)Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
  3. ^ Unless otherwise shown, genera are from the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website.[7]

References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Agardh JG. Theoria Syst. Pl. 32 (1858)
  2. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Seberg, Ole (2007). "Alliaceae". In Heywood, Vernon H.; Brummitt, Richard K. & Culham, Alastair (eds.). Flowering Plant Families of the World. Richmond Hill, Ontario: Firefly Books. pp. 340–341. ISBN 978-1-55407-206-4.
  3. ^ Armen L. Takhtajan (Takhtadzhian). Flowering Plants second edition (2009). Springer Science+Business Media. Template:ISBN.
  4. ^ a b Knud Rahn. 1998. "Alliaceae" pages 70–78. In: Klaus Kubitzki (general editor) with Klaus Kubitzki, Herbert F.J. Huber, Paula J. Rudall, Peter F. Stevens, and Thomas Stützel (volume editors). The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants volume III. Springer-Verlag: Berlin;Heidelberg, Germany. Template:ISBN
  5. ^ Michael F. Fay, Paula J. Rudall, and Mark W. Chase. 2006. "Molecular studies of subfamily Gilliesioideae (Alliaceae)". Aliso 22(Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution):367–371. ISSN 0065-6275.
  6. ^ J. Chris Pires, Ivan J. Maureira, Thomas J. Givnish, Kenneth J. Sytsma, Ole Seberg, Gitte Petersen, Jerrold I. Davis, Dennis W. Stevenson, Paula J. Rudall, Michael F. Fay, and Mark W. Chase. 2006. "Phylogeny, genome size, and chromosome evolution of Asparagales". Aliso 22(Monocots: Comparative Biology and Evolution):287–304. ISSN 0065-6275.
  7. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Stevens, P.F. (2001–2017). "Asparagales: Allioideae". Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Retrieved 10 July 2020.
  8. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Canio Giuseppe Vosa (2007). "Prototulbaghia, a new genus of the Alliaceae family from the Leolo Mountains in Sekhukhuneland, South Africa" (PDF). Caryologia. 60 (3): 273–278. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.494.6523. doi:10.1080/00087114.2007.10797948. S2CID 45409345. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 May 2013.
  9. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bogler, David J.; Pires, J. Chris; Francisco-Ortega, Javier (2006). "Phylogeny of Agavaceae Based on ndhF, rbcL, and its Sequences". Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany. 22 (1): 313–328. doi:10.5642/aliso.20062201.26.
  10. ^ Anthony Huxley, Mark Griffiths, and Margot Levy (1992). The New Royal Horticultural Society Dictionary of Gardening. The Macmillan Press,Limited: London. The Stockton Press: New York. Template:ISBN (set).

Bibliography

Page Template:Refbegin/styles.css has no content.

History

Early

Table of 58 families, Part II: Page 1
Table of 1615 genera, Part II: Page 8

Twentieth century

Taxonomy

Further reading

Page Template:Refbegin/styles.css has no content.

Page Module:Side box/styles.css has no content.Page Template:Sister project/styles.css has no content.

Page Module:Side box/styles.css has no content.Page Template:Sister project/styles.css has no content.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found. Script error: No such module "Taxonbar". Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Authority control/config' not found.