Creatio ex nihilo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Creation from nothing)

Template:Short description Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Hatnote list' not found. Template:Titlelang

File:WLANL - MicheleLovesArt - Joods Historisch Museum - Levensboom glas in lood - Eli Content (Midden).jpg
Tree of Life by Eli Content at the Joods Historisch Museum. The Tree of Life, or Script error: No such module "lang". (Script error: No such module "Lang".) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world Script error: No such module "Lang". (out of nothing).

Script error: No such module "Lang". (Latin, 'creation out of nothing') or nihilogony is the doctrine that matter is not eternal but had to be created by some divine creative act.[1] It is a theistic answer to the question of how the universe came to exist. It is in contrast to creatio ex materia and foundationalism (creation from matter resulting from logical aseity, also known as Resultante ex Aseitate Logica[citation needed], but modern foundationalism is cosmological with improvements from the 17th-century viewpoint that are sometimes framed in terms of the dictum ex nihilo nihil fit or 'nothing comes from nothing', meaning all things were formed ex materia—that is, from pre-existing things).

Creatio ex materia

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Creatio ex materia refers to the idea that matter has always existed and that the modern cosmos is a reformation of pre-existing, primordial matter; it is sometimes articulated by the philosophical dictum that nothing can come from nothing.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

In ancient Near Eastern cosmology, the universe is formed ex materia from eternal formless matter,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. namely the dark and still primordial ocean of chaos.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. In Sumerian myth, this cosmic ocean is personified as the goddess Nammu "who gave birth to heaven and earth" and had existed forever;Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. in the Babylonian creation epic Enūma Eliš, pre-existent chaos is made up of freshwater Apsu and saltwater Tiamat, and from Tiamat, the god Marduk created Heaven and Earth;Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. in Egyptian creation myths, a pre-existent watery chaos personified as the god Nun, and associated with darkness, gave birth to the primeval hill (or in some versions, a primeval lotus flower, or in others, a celestial cow);Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. and in Greek traditions, the ultimate origin of the universe, depending on the source, is sometimes Oceanus (a river that circles the Earth), Night, or water.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

In Genesis

Similarly, the Genesis creation narrative opens with the Hebrew phrase Script error: No such module "lang"., which can be interpreted in at least three ways:

  1. As a statement that the cosmos had an absolute beginning (In the beginning, God created the heavens and earth...)
  2. As a statement describing the condition of the world when God began creating (When God began to create the heavens and the earth, the earth was formless...)
  3. As background information (When, in the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth, the earth being formless... God said, "Let there be light!")Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Though the first option is the traditional view[2], Rabbinical commentators and experts in Hebrew have suggested since the Middle Ages that it cannot be preferred over the second or third option based on purely linguistic and exegetical groundsLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.. Whereas our modern societies see the origin of matter as a question of crucial importance, this may not have been the case for ancient cultures. Some scholars assert that the authors of GenesisLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. could have been more concerned with another form of creation, such as God giving form and role to an purposeless and inoperative abyss, resembling other Ancient Near Eastern creation stories and mythological frameworksLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found..

Creatio ex nihilo in religion

Creatio ex nihilo is the doctrine that all matter was created out of nothing by God in an initializing act whereby the cosmos came into existence.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.[3] The third-century founder of Neoplatonism, Plotinus, argued that the cosmos was instead an emanation of God. Emanationism was rejected by Jewish philosophers, as well as the Church Fathers and Muslim philosophers who followed.[4]

African traditional religions

African traditional religions tend to favour creatio ex materia over creatio ex nihilo,[5] and it is absent in Akan, Acholi, and Yoruba religions.[6]Template:R/superscript Ghanaian philosopher Kwasi Wiredu has argued that some religions such as those of the Shona, Nuer, and Banyarwanda "affirm the notion of creatio ex nihilo".[7]Template:R/superscript

Ancient Near East

Although ancient Near Eastern cosmology is read as invoking a process of creatio ex materia,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. occasional suggestions have been made that creatio ex nihilo can be found at least in some texts, including the Egyptian Memphite theology and the Hebrew Biblical Genesis creation narrative.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Hilber rejected these interpretations, viewing both as consistent with creatio ex materia and instead suggesting that some passages in the Book of Isaiah, the Book of Proverbs, and the Psalms indicate a form of creatio ex nihilo.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The cosmogonical doxologies of the Book of Amos also present a view of creation ex nihilo.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Bakongo spirituality

In Bakongo religion, the Bakongo people believe that "the world in its beginning was empty; it was an mbûngi, an empty thing, a cavity, without visible life." Mbûngi (also called mwasi and mpampa) was symbolized as a circle of emptiness. The creator god Nzambi, along with his female counterpart called Nzambici, is believed to have created a spark of fire, called kalûnga, and summoned it inside of mbûngi. Kalûnga grew and became a great force of energy inside of mbûngi, creating a mass of fusion. When the mass grew too hot, the heated force caused the mass to break apart and hurl projectiles outside of mbûngi. Those projectiles became individual masses that scattered about, and when the fires cooled, planets formed and life came to be. The Bakongo believe this was the process Nzambi used to create the universe, with the sun, stars, planets, etc. The Bakongo referred to this process as luku lwalamba Nzambi, or "God created and cooked dough." Because of this, kalûnga is seen as the origin of life, or moyo wawo mu nza, and the Bakongo believe that life requires constant change and perpetual motion. Thus, Nzambi is also referred to as Kalûnga, the god of change. Similarities between the Bakongo belief of kalûnga and the Big Bang Theory have been studied. Unlike many other traditional African spiritualities, the creation beliefs of the Bakongo are compatible with creatio ex nihilio.[8]

Christianity

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Nicene Christian theologies hold to creation ex nihilo.[9] The doctrine has been defended in Christian circles since early in the religion's development, receiving its first explicit articulation in the late 2nd Century by Theophilus of Antioch in To Autolycus. In a chapter entitled "Absurd Opinions of the Philosophers Concerning God", he writes:

Page Template:Blockquote/styles.css has no content.

As, therefore, in all these respects God is more powerful than man, so also in this; that out of things that are not He creates and has created things that are.[10][11]

Theophilus's statement is nearly identical to epistle to the Romans 4:17: Page Template:Blockquote/styles.css has no content.

God...who quickeneth the dead; and calleth those things that are not, as those that are.

Thus, there is evidence that creation ex nihilo was being discussed in at least some Christian theological circles by the 3rd century.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.[12] In late antiquity, John Philoponus was its most prominent defender.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Some theologians have proposed alternatives to creatio ex nihilo, like the idea of God creating the universe from Godself (ex ipse), which suggests the universe is similar to God. Others argue for creation from pre-existent matter (ex materia), implying the world does not rely on God for existence.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The notion of creatio ex nihilo underlies some modern arguments for the existence of God among Christian and other theistic philosophers, especially as articulated in the cosmological argument,[13] as well as its more particular manifestation in the Kalam cosmological argument.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Augustine of Hippo affirmed an allegorical interpretation of the six-day account of creation in the book of Genesis.[14] He argues that the number 7 is significant and serves as a symbol of the perfection of God's creative work. He suggests that the first three days of creation cannot be considered perfect because the Sun was created on the fourth day. Additionally, he notes that the night of the sixth day is not mentioned in the biblical account. Augustine further contends that the notion of God resting on the seventh day is questionable, as God is characterized as possessing all forms of wealth and is eternally unchangeable; thus, a change in state between the sixth and seventh days is deemed illogical. He emphasizes the concept of divine immutability and asserts that nothing can be added to the divine essence at any point—in relation to the unity of the Triune God worshipped in Nicene Christianity—while recognizing the distinct persons within the Trinity.[15]

According to Ambrose of Milan, God's rest follows the creation of humankind because God rests in the human being, which allows for a relationship of love to be established. In this context, God's rest is understood as a realization of love for his creatures, which is further connected to the concept of redemption in Christian theology. Ambrose distinguishes a link between the 'rest of God' and the 'rest' of Jesus on the cross.[16]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Adherents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints do not believe, as Nicene Christians do, that God created the universe ex nihilo.[17] Rather, to Latter-day Saints, GodTemplate:'s act of creation is essentially an organization of pre-existing matter, or creatio ex materia.[18]

Hinduism

The Chandogya Upanishad 6:2:1 declares that before the world was manifested, there was only "existence" itself, one and unparalleled (sat eva ekam eva advitīyam). Swami Lokeshwarananda commented on this passage, saying, "something out of nothing is an absurd idea".[19]

Islam

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Most scholars of Islam, like Judaism and Christianity, hold the belief that God is the unmoved mover and creator; he did not create the world from pre-existing matter.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.[20]

Judaism

One of the earliest recorded articulations of the concept of creatio ex nihilo is in the non-canonical Jewish text 2 Maccabees.[21][22] In 2 Maccabees 7:28, the author writes: Page Template:Blockquote/styles.css has no content.

I implore you, my child, observe heaven and earth, consider all that is in them, and acknowledge that God made them out of what did not exist, and that mankind comes into being the same way.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Some have argued against interpreting 2 Maccabees this way, and none of the books of Maccabees are included in the Jewish canon.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

In the first century CE, Philo of Alexandria, a Hellenized Jew, laid out the basic idea of ex nihilo creation, albeit inconsistently. Philo rejected the Greek notion of an eternal universe, maintaining that God created time itself.[23] In other places,[specify] it has been argued that he postulated pre-existent matter alongside God.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Later scholars, such as Harry Austryn Wolfson, interpreted Philo's cosmology differently, arguing that the so-called pre-existent matter was indeed created.[24]

Saadia Gaon, a late 9th- and 10th-century Middle Egyptian-Palestinian rabbi, gaon, philosopher, and exegete, formally introduced ex nihilo creation into Jewish Tanakh interpretation with the Book of Beliefs and Opinions, the first systematic theology of Rabbinic Judaism. Today, religious Judaism asserts creation ex nihilo, although some Jewish scholars maintain that Genesis 1:1 allows for the pre-existence of matter to which God gives form.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

Hasidism and Kabbalah

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Jewish philosophers of the 9th and 10th centuries adopted the concept of "yesh me-Ayin" (something from nothing), contradicting Greek philosophers and the Aristotelian stance that the world was created out of primordial matter and/or was eternal.[25]

Stoicism

Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".

Stoicism, founded by Zeno of Citium c. 300 BCE, holds the belief that creation out of nothing is impossible and that Zeus created the world out of his own being.[26]

In modern science

Script error: No such module "labelled list hatnote". The Big Bang theory, in contrast to theology, is a scientific theory; it offers no explanation of cosmic existence but only a description of the first few moments of the existence of the current universe.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.[27]

See also

References

Citations

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
  2. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Asante, Molefi Kete; Mazama, Ama (2009). Encyclopedia of African Religion. SAGE. pp. 90–91. ISBN 978-1-4129-3636-1.
  3. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McFarland, Ian A. (2022). "Creation". St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology. Archived from the original on 2023-04-07. Retrieved 2023-04-07.
  4. ^ Harry Austryn Wolfson, “The Meaning of Ex Nihilo in the Church Fathers, Arabic and Hebrew Philosophy, and St. Thomas” Script error: No such module "webarchive".
  5. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Ofuasia, Emmanuel (2022-12-30). ""Who/What Neglected the Monotheism?": A Panentheistic Rejoinder to Thaddeus Metz and Motsamai Molefe on African Traditional Religion". Philosophia Africana. 21 (2): 78–99. doi:10.5325/philafri.21.2.0078. ISSN 1539-8250.
  6. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Wiredu, Kwasi, ed. (2006). A companion to African philosophy. Internet Archive. Malden, MA : Blackwell Pub. ISBN 978-1-4051-4567-1.
  7. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Agada, Ada (2023), "God's Existence and the Problem of Evil in African Philosophy of Religion", Handbook of African Philosophy, Handbooks in Philosophy, Springer, Cham, pp. 555–574, doi:10.1007/978-3-031-25149-8_31, ISBN 978-3-031-25149-8, retrieved 2025-08-09{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  8. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Fu-Kiau, Kimbwandènde Kia Bunseki (2001). African Cosmology of the Bântu-Kôngo: Tying the Spiritual Knot : Principles of Life & Living (2nd ed.). Canada: Athelia Henrietta Press - Orunmila. pp. 17–22, 90, 91. ISBN 9781890157289.
  9. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Samples, K.R. (2012). 7 Truths That Changed the World (Reasons to Believe): Discovering Christianity's Most Dangerous Ideas. Baker Publishing Group. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-4412-3850-4.
  10. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."To Autolycus, Book II". www.newadvent.org.
  11. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Craig D. Allert (24 July 2018). Early Christian Readings of Genesis One: Patristic Exegesis and Literal Interpretation. InterVarsity Press. pp. 213–. ISBN 978-0-8308-8783-5. Archived from the original on 15 August 2023. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
  12. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.James L. Kugel; James L Kugel (30 June 2009). Traditions of the Bible: A Guide to the Bible As It Was at the Start of the Common Era. Harvard University Press. pp. 62–. ISBN 978-0-674-03976-6. Archived from the original on 15 August 2023. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
  13. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Pecorino, Philip A. "The Cosmological Argument". Introduction To Philosophy. Queensborough Community College, CUNY. Archived from the original on 2022-01-23. Retrieved 2022-01-17.
  14. ^ According to the De Genesi ad litteram, for example, attributed to Augustine of Hippo, the story of creation in six days should be understood in an allegorical sense. God did not create the universe in six days, but rather in a single eternal instant outside of time, inserting into the entities the reasons for their causality (called rationes seminales) that subsequently governed their development according to divine law. Creation should be interpreted in the light of Script error: No such module "Bibleverse". according to which God creates things with "order, weight and measure" (cf. Augustine, De Genesi ad litteram 4,21,3.
  15. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Andrea Lonardo. "Agostino, Galilei e i sette giorni della creazione". www.gliscritti.it (in italiano). Retrieved 2024-05-22. Quote: "For both Jewish and Christian exegesis, the seven days of creation are not real days, as Augustine teaches - and, on his account, Galileo -, even if some moderns seem to ignore the basic rules already known to ancient exegesis. 'Could God have rested for one day?' - argues Augustine. 'No, this is obviously impossible and for this reason those days must be understood in a non-literal sense'."
  16. ^ Hexameron, IX, 10. Quote: "The Lord rested in man's innermost being, rested in his mind and thought: for he had created man endowed with reason, capable of imitating him. [...] I read that he created man and that at this point he rested, having a being to whom he would forgive sins. Or perhaps already then the mystery of the Lord's future passion was foretold, by which it was revealed that Christ would rest in man, he who predestined to himself rest in a human body for man's Redemption."
  17. ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
  18. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Grant, David (1992). "Matter". Encyclopedia of Mormonism.
  19. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.www.wisdomlib.org (2019-01-04). "Chandogya Upanishad, Verse 6.2.1 (English and Sanskrit)". www.wisdomlib.org. Archived from the original on 2022-09-06. Retrieved 2022-09-06.
  20. ^ Husam Muhi Eldin al- Alousi The Problem of Creation in Islamic Thought, Qur'an, Hadith, Commentaries, and KalamNational Printing and Publishing, Bagdad, 1968 p. 29 and 96
  21. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.K. A. Mathews (1996). Genesis 1-11:26. B&H Publishing Group. pp. 141–. ISBN 978-0-8054-0101-1. Archived from the original on 2023-08-15. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  22. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Paul Copan; William Lane Craig (June 2004). Creation Out of Nothing: A Biblical, Philosophical, and Scientific Exploration. Baker Academic. pp. 99–. ISBN 978-0-8010-2733-8. Archived from the original on 2023-08-15. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  23. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.David B. Burrell; Carlo Cogliati; Janet M. Soskice; William R. Stoeger (2 September 2010). Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge University Press. pp. 33–. ISBN 978-1-139-49078-8. Archived from the original on 15 August 2023. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
  24. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Institute for Christian Studies (1994). Hellenization Revisited: Shaping a Christian Response Within the Greco-Roman World. University Press of America. pp. 115–. ISBN 978-0-8191-9544-9. Archived from the original on 2023-08-15. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  25. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Joseph Dan (1987). Argumentum e Silentio. W. de Gruyter. pp. 359–362. ISBN 978-0-89925-314-5. Retrieved 11 February 2011.
  26. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Mitchell, S.; Van Nuffelen, P. (2010). One God: Pagan Monotheism in the Roman Empire. Cambridge University Press. p. 72. ISBN 978-1-139-48814-3.
  27. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Brief Answers to Cosmic Questions". Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics for NASA's Education Support Network. Archived from the original on 2016-04-13. Retrieved 2021-09-10. It is a common misconception that the Big Bang was the origin of the universe. In reality, the Big Bang scenario is completely silent about how the universe came into existence in the first place. In fact, the closer we look to time "zero," the less certain we are about what actually happened, because our current description of physical laws do not yet apply to such extremes of nature. The Big Bang scenario simply assumes that space, time, and energy already existed. But it tells us nothing about where they came from - or why the universe was born hot and dense to begin with.

Bibliography

Page Template:Refbegin/styles.css has no content.

Further reading

  • Anderson, Gary A. & Markus Bockmuehl (eds.), Creation ex nihilo, University of Notre Dame Press, 2018.

Template:Genesis 1