r/K selection theory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from K-selection)

Template:Short description

North Atlantic right whale with solitary calf. Whale reproduction follows K-selection strategy, with few offspring, long gestation, long parental care, and a long period until sexual maturity.

The r/K selection theory is an evolutionary hypothesis examining the selection of traits in an organism that trade off between quantity and quality of offspring. Species which produce more offspring at the expense of reduced individual parental investment are termed r-strategists, while those which make greater parental investment at the expense of a reduced quantity of offspring are termed K-strategists. The occurrence of the two varies widely, seemingly to promote success in particular environments.

The concepts of quantity or quality offspring are sometimes referred to in ecology as "cheap" or "expensive", a comment on the expendable nature of the offspring and parental commitment made.[1] The stability of the environment can predict if many expendable offspring are made or if fewer offspring of higher quality would lead to higher reproductive success. An unstable environment would encourage the parent to make many offspring, because the likelihood of all (or the majority) of them surviving to adulthood is slim. In contrast, more stable environments allow parents to confidently invest in one offspring because they are more likely to survive to adulthood.

The terminology of r/K-selection was coined by the ecologists Robert MacArthur and E. O. Wilson in 1967[2] based on their work on island biogeography;[3] although the concept of the evolution of life history strategies has a longer history[4] (see e.g. plant strategies).

The theory was popular in the 1970s and 1980s, when it was used as a heuristic device, but lost importance in the early 1990s, when it was criticized by several empirical studies.[5][6] A life history paradigm has replaced the r/K selection paradigm, but continues to incorporate its important themes as a subset of life history theory.[7] Some scientists now prefer to use the terms fast versus slow life history as a replacement for, respectively, r versus K reproductive strategy.[8]

Overview

A litter of mice with their mother. The reproduction of mice follows an r-selection strategy, with many offspring, short gestation, less parental care, and a short time until sexual maturity. The same applies to rats.

In r/K selection theory, selective pressures are hypothesised to drive evolution in one of two generalized directions: r- or K-selection.[2] These terms, r and K, are drawn from standard ecological formula as illustrated in the simplified Verhulst model of population dynamics:[9]

dNdt=r N(1− N K)

where N is the population, r is the maximum growth rate, K is the carrying capacity of the local environment (from German Kapazitätsgrenze),[10] and Page Template:Sfrac/styles.css has no content.⁠ dN / dt ⁠ (the derivative of population size N with respect to time t) is the rate of change in population with time. Thus, the equation relates the growth rate of the population N to the current population size, incorporating the effect of the two constant parameters r and K. (Note that when the population size is greater than the carrying capacity then 1 - N/K is negative, which indicates a population decline or negative growth.) The choice of the letter K came from the German Kapazitätsgrenze (capacity limit), while r came from rate.

r-selection

r-selected species are those that emphasize high growth rates, typically exploit less-crowded ecological niches, and produce many offspring, each of which has a relatively low probability of surviving to adulthood (i.e., high r, low K).[11] A typical r species is the dandelion (genus Taraxacum).

In unstable or unpredictable environments, r-selection predominates due to the ability to reproduce rapidly. There is little advantage in adaptations that permit successful competition with other organisms, because the environment is likely to change again. Among the traits that are thought to characterize r-selection are high fecundity, small body size, early maturity onset, short generation time, and the ability to disperse offspring widely.

Organisms whose life history is subject to r-selection are often referred to as r-strategists or r-selected. Groups of organisms known for exhibiting r-selected traits are bacteria, diatoms, insects, grasses, cephalopods, fowl, and rodents.

K-selection

A bald eagle, an individual of a typical K-strategist species. K-strategists have longer life expectancies, produce fewer offspring, and when young tend to be altricial requiring extensive care by parents.

By contrast, K-selected species display traits associated with living at densities close to carrying capacity and typically are strong competitors in such crowded niches, that invest more heavily in fewer offspring, each of which has a relatively high probability of surviving to adulthood (i.e., low r, high K). In scientific literature, r-selected species are occasionally referred to as "opportunistic" whereas K-selected species are described as "equilibrium".[11]

In stable or predictable environments, K-selection predominates as the ability to compete successfully for limited resources is crucial and populations of K-selected organisms typically are very constant in number and close to the maximum that the environment can bear (unlike r-selected populations, where population sizes can change much more rapidly).

Traits that are thought to be characteristic of K-selection include large body size, long life expectancy, and the production of fewer offspring, which often require extensive parental care until they mature. Organisms whose life history is subject to K-selection are often referred to as K-strategists or K-selected.[12] Organisms with K-selected traits include large organisms such as elephants, sharks, humans, and whales, but also smaller long-lived organisms such as Arctic terns,[13] parrots, and eagles.

Continuous spectrum

Although some organisms are identified as primarily r- or K-strategists, the majority of organisms do not follow this pattern. For instance, trees have traits such as longevity and strong competitiveness that characterise them as K-strategists. In reproduction, however, trees typically produce thousands of offspring and disperse them widely, traits characteristic of r-strategists.[14]

Similarly, reptiles such as sea turtles display both r- and K-traits: Although sea turtles are large organisms with long lifespans (provided they reach adulthood), they produce large numbers of unnurtured offspring.

The r/K dichotomy can be re-expressed as a continuous spectrum using the economic concept of discounted future returns, with r-selection corresponding to large discount rates and K-selection corresponding to small discount rates.[15]

Ecological succession

In areas of major ecological disruption or sterilisation (such as after a major volcanic eruption, as at Krakatoa or Mount St. Helens), r- and K-strategists play distinct roles in the ecological succession that regenerates the ecosystem. Because of their higher reproductive rates and ecological opportunism, primary colonisers typically are r-strategists and they are followed by a succession of increasingly competitive flora and fauna. The ability of an environment to increase energetic content, through photosynthetic capture of solar energy, increases with the increase in complex biodiversity as r species proliferate to reach a peak possible with K strategies.[16]

Eventually a new equilibrium is approached (sometimes referred to as a climax community), with r-strategists gradually being replaced by K-strategists which are more competitive and better adapted to the emerging micro-environmental characteristics of the landscape. Traditionally, biodiversity was considered maximized at this stage, with introductions of new species resulting in the replacement and local extinction of endemic species.[17] However, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis posits that intermediate levels of disturbance in a landscape create patches at different levels of succession, promoting coexistence of colonizers and competitors at the regional scale.

Application

While usually applied at the level of species, r/K selection theory is also useful in studying the evolution of ecological and life history differences between subspecies, for instance the African honey bee, A. m. scutellata, and the Italian bee, A. m. ligustica.[18] At the other end of the scale, it has also been used to study the evolutionary ecology of whole groups of organisms, such as bacteriophages.[19] Other researchers have proposed that the evolution of human inflammatory responses is related to r/K selection.[20]

Some researchers, such as Lee Ellis, J. Philippe Rushton, and Aurelio José Figueredo, have attempted to apply r/K selection theory to various human behaviors, including crime,[21] sexual promiscuity, fertility, IQ, and other traits related to life history theory.[22][23] Rushton developed "differential K theory" to attempt to explain variations in behavior across human races.[23][24] Differential K theory has been debunked as being devoid of empirical basis, and has also been described as a key example of scientific racism.[25][26][27]

Status

Although r/K selection theory became widely used during the 1970s,[28][29][30][31] it also began to attract more critical attention.[32][33][34][35] In particular, a review in 1977 by the ecologist Stephen C. Stearns drew attention to gaps in the theory, and to ambiguities in the interpretation of empirical data for testing it.[36]

In 1981, a review of the r/K selection literature by Parry demonstrated that there was no agreement among researchers using the theory about the definition of r- and K-selection, which led him to question whether the assumption of a relation between reproductive expenditure and packaging of offspring was justified.[37] A 1982 study by Templeton and Johnson showed that in a population of Drosophila mercatorum under K-selection the population actually produced a higher frequency of traits typically associated with r-selection.[38] Several other studies contradicting the predictions of r/K selection theory were also published between 1977 and 1994.[39][40][41][42]

When Stearns reviewed the status of the theory again in 1992,[43] he noted that from 1977 to 1982 there was an average of 42 references to the theory per year in the BIOSIS literature search service, but from 1984 to 1989 the average dropped to 16 per year and continued to decline. He concluded that r/K theory was a once useful heuristic that no longer serves a purpose in life history theory.[44]

More recently, the panarchy theories of adaptive capacity and resilience promoted by C. S. Holling and Lance Gunderson have revived interest in the theory, and use it as a way of integrating social systems, economics, and ecology.[45]

Writing in 2002, Reznick and colleagues reviewed the controversy regarding r/K selection theory and concluded that: Template:Quote

Alternative approaches are now available both for studying life history evolution (e.g. Leslie matrix for an age-structured population) and for density-dependent selection (e.g. variable density lottery model[46]).

See also

References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."r and K selection". www.bio.miami.edu. Archived from the original on 2014-09-05. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  2. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Pianka, E.R. (1970). "On r and K selection". American Naturalist. 104 (940): 592–597. Bibcode:1970ANat..104..592P. doi:10.1086/282697. S2CID 83933177.
  3. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.MacArthur, R.; Wilson, E.O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography (2001 reprint ed.). Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-08836-5.
  4. ^ For example: Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Margalef, R. (1959). Mode of evolution of species in relation to their places in ecological succession. XVTH International Congress of Zoology.
  5. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Roff, Derek A. (1993). Evolution Of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis. Springer. ISBN 978-0-412-02391-0.
  6. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Stearns, Stephen C. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-857741-6.
  7. ^ Cite error: The named reference ReznickEA2002 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  8. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Jeschke, Jonathan M.; Kokko, Hanna (2009). "The roles of body size and phylogeny in fast and slow life histories". Evolutionary Ecology. 23 (6): 867–878. Bibcode:2009EvEco..23..867J. doi:10.1007/s10682-008-9276-y. S2CID 38289373.
  9. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Verhulst, P.F. (1838). "Notice sur la loi que la population pursuit dans son accroissement". Corresp. Math. Phys. 10: 113–121.
  10. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Verhulst, Pierre-François (1838). "Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement" (PDF). Correspondance Mathématique et Physique. 10: 113–121. Retrieved 3 December 2014.
  11. ^ a b For example: Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Weinbauer, M.G.; Höfle, M.G. (1 October 1998). "Distribution and Life Strategies of Two Bacterial Populations in a Eutrophic Lake". Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 (10): 3776–3783. Bibcode:1998ApEnM..64.3776W. doi:10.1128/AEM.64.10.3776-3783.1998. PMC 106546. PMID 9758799.
  12. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."r and K selection". Department of Biology. University of Miami. Archived from the original on 2014-09-05. Retrieved 4 February 2011.
  13. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Duffus, John H.; Templeton, Douglas M.; Nordberg, Monica (2009). Concepts in Toxicology. Royal Society of Chemistry. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-85404-157-2.
  14. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer (2000). Mother Nature: Maternal instincts and how they shape the human species. Ballantine Books.
  15. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Reluga, T.; Medlock, J.; Galvani, A. (2009). "The discounted reproductive number for epidemiology". Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering. 6 (2): 377–393. doi:10.3934/mbe.2009.6.377. PMC 3685506. PMID 19364158.
  16. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gunderson, Lance H.; Holling, C.S. (2001). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations In Human And Natural Systems. Island Press. ISBN 978-1-55963-857-9.
  17. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McNeely, J.A. (1994). "Lessons of the past: Forests and biodiversity". Biodiversity and Conservation. 3 (1): 3–20. Bibcode:1994BiCon...3....3M. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.461.5908. doi:10.1007/BF00115329. S2CID 245731.
  18. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Fewell, Jennifer H.; Bertram, Susan M. (2002). "Evidence for genetic variation in worker task performance by African and European honeybees". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 52 (4): 318–25. Bibcode:2002BEcoS..52..318F. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0501-3. S2CID 22128779.
  19. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Keen, E.C. (2014). "Tradeoffs in bacteriophage life histories". Bacteriophage. 4 (1) e28365. doi:10.4161/bact.28365. PMC 3942329. PMID 24616839.
  20. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.van Bodegom, D.; May, L.; Meij, H.J.; Westendorp, R.G.J. (2007). "Regulation of human life histories: The role of the inflammatory host response". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1100 (1): 84–97. Bibcode:2007NYASA1100...84V. doi:10.1196/annals.1395.007. PMID 17460167. S2CID 43589115.
  21. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Ellis, Lee (1987-01-01). "Criminal behavior and r/K selection: An extension of gene-based evolutionary theory". Deviant Behavior. 8 (2): 149–176. doi:10.1080/01639625.1987.9967739. ISSN 0163-9625.
  22. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Figueredo, Aurelio José; Vásquez, Geneva; Brumbach, Barbara Hagenah; Schneider, Stephanie M. R. (2007-03-01). "The K-factor, covitality, and personality". Human Nature. 18 (1): 47–73. doi:10.1007/bf02820846. ISSN 1045-6767. PMID 26181744. S2CID 10877330.
  23. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Weizmann, Fredric; Wiener, Neil I.; Wiesenthal, David L.; Ziegler, Michael (1990). "Differential K theory and racial hierarchies". Canadian Psychology. 31 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1037/h0078934.
  24. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Peregrine, P (2003). "Cross-cultural evaluation of predicted associations between race and behavior". Evolution and Human Behavior. 24 (5): 357–364. Bibcode:2003EHumB..24..357P. doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(03)00040-0.
  25. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Winston, Andrew S. (29 May 2020). "Scientific Racism and North American Psychology". Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Psychology. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.516. ISBN 978-0-19-023655-7.
  26. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Weizmann, Frederic; Wiener, Neil I.; Wiesenthal, David L.; Ziegler, Michael (1989). "Scientific racism in contemporary psychology". International Journal of Dynamic Assessment & Instruction. 1 (1): 81–93.
  27. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Statement from the Department of Psychology regarding research conducted by Dr. J. Philippe Rushton". Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario.
  28. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gadgil, M.; Solbrig, O.T. (1972). "Concept of r-selection and K-selection — evidence from wild flowers and some theoretical consideration" (PDF). Am. Nat. 106 (947): 14–31. doi:10.1086/282748. JSTOR 2459833. S2CID 86412666.
  29. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Long, T.; Long, G. (1974). "Effects of r-selection and K-selection on components of variance for 2 quantitative traits". Genetics. 76 (3): 567–573. doi:10.1093/genetics/76.3.567. PMC 1213086. PMID 4208860.
  30. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Grahame, J. (1977). "Reproductive effort and r-selection and K-selection in 2 species of Lacuna (Gastropoda-Prosobranchia)". Mar. Biol. 40 (3): 217–224. doi:10.1007/BF00390877. S2CID 82459157.
  31. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Luckinbill, L.S. (1978). "r and K selection in experimental populations of Escherichia coli". Science. 202 (4373): 1201–1203. Bibcode:1978Sci...202.1201L. doi:10.1126/science.202.4373.1201. PMID 17735406. S2CID 43276882.
  32. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Wilbur, H.M.; Tinkle, D.W.; Collins, J.P. (1974). "Environmental certainty, trophic level, and resource availability in life history evolution". American Naturalist. 108 (964): 805–816. Bibcode:1974ANat..108..805W. doi:10.1086/282956. JSTOR 2459610. S2CID 84902967.
  33. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Barbault, R. (1987). "Are still r-selection and K-selection operative concepts?". Acta Oecologica – Oecologia Generalis. 8: 63–70.
  34. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Kuno, E. (1991). "Some strange properties of the logistic equation defined with r and K – inherent defects or artifacts". Researches on Population Ecology. 33 (1): 33–39. Bibcode:1991PopEc..33...33K. doi:10.1007/BF02514572. S2CID 9459529.
  35. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Getz, W.M. (1993). "Metaphysiological and evolutionary dynamics of populations exploiting constant and interactive resources – r-K selection revisited". Evolutionary Ecology. 7 (3): 287–305. Bibcode:1993EvEco...7..287G. doi:10.1007/BF01237746. S2CID 21296836.
  36. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Stearns, S.C. (1977). "The Evolution of Life History Traits: A Critique of the Theory and a Review of the Data" (PDF). Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 8 (1): 145–171. Bibcode:1977AnRES...8..145S. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.08.110177.001045. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-12-16.
  37. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Parry, G.D. (March 1981). "The meanings of r- and K-selection". Oecologia. 48 (2): 260–4. Bibcode:1981Oecol..48..260P. doi:10.1007/BF00347974. PMID 28309810. S2CID 30728470.
  38. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Templeton, A.R.; Johnson, J.S. (1982). "Life History Evolution Under Pleiotropy and K-selection in a Natural Population of Drosophila mercatorum". In Barker, J.S.F.; Starmer, William T. (eds.). Ecological genetics and evolution: The cactus-yeast-drosophila model system. Academic Press. pp. 225–239. ISBN 978-0-12-078820-0.
  39. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Snell, Terry W.; King, Charles E. (December 1977). "Lifespan and fecundity patterns in rotifers: The cost of reproduction". Evolution. 31 (4): 882–890. doi:10.2307/2407451. JSTOR 2407451. PMID 28563718.
  40. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Taylor, Charles E.; Condra, Cindra (November 1980). "r- and K-selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura". Evolution. 34 (6): 1183–93. doi:10.2307/2408299. JSTOR 2408299. PMID 28568469.
  41. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hollocher, H.; Templeton, A.R. (April 1994). "The molecular through ecological genetics of abnormal abdomen in Drosophila mercatorum VI. The non-neutrality of the Y chromosome rDNA polymorphism". Genetics. 136 (4): 1373–84. doi:10.1093/genetics/136.4.1373. PMC 1205918. PMID 8013914.
  42. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Templeton, A.R.; Hollocher, H.; Johnston, J.S. (June 1993). "The molecular through ecological genetics of abnormal abdomen in Drosophila mercatorum V. Female phenotypic expression on natural genetic backgrounds and in natural environments". Genetics. 134 (2): 475–85. doi:10.1093/genetics/134.2.475. PMC 1205491. PMID 8325484.
  43. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Stearns, S.C. (1992). The Evolution of Life Histories. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-857741-6.
  44. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Graves, J.L. (2002). "What a tangled web he weaves: Race, reproductive strategies and Rushton's life history theory". Anthropological Theory. 2 (2): 2 131–154. doi:10.1177/1469962002002002627. S2CID 144377864.
  45. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gunderson, L.H.; Holling, C.S. (2001). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press. p. 7. ISBN 978-1-59726-939-1.
  46. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bertram, Jason; Masel, Joanna (October 2019). "Density-dependent selection and the limits of relative fitness". Theoretical Population Biology. 129: 81–92. Bibcode:2019TPBio.129...81B. doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2018.11.006. PMID 30664884.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found.

Retrieved from "https://cosmopedia.co/index.php?title=R/K_selection_theory&oldid=1024661#K-selection"