Mean signed deviation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Mean signed difference)

In statistics, the mean signed difference (MSD),[1] also known as mean signed deviation, mean signed error, or mean bias error[2] is a sample statistic that summarizes how well a set of estimates θ̂i match the quantities θi that they are supposed to estimate. It is one of a number of statistics that can be used to assess an estimation procedure, and it would often be used in conjunction with a sample version of the mean square error.

For example, suppose a linear regression model has been estimated over a sample of data, and is then used to extrapolate predictions of the dependent variable out of sample after the out-of-sample data points have become available. Then θi would be the i-th out-of-sample value of the dependent variable, and θ̂i would be its predicted value. The mean signed deviation is the average value of θ̂iθi.

Definition

The mean signed difference is derived from a set of n pairs, (θ̂i,θi), where θ̂i is an estimate of the parameter θ in a case where it is known that θ=θi. In many applications, all the quantities θi will share a common value. When applied to forecasting in a time series analysis context, a forecasting procedure might be evaluated using the mean signed difference, with θ̂i being the predicted value of a series at a given lead time and θi being the value of the series eventually observed for that time-point. The mean signed difference is defined to be

MSD(θ̂)=1ni=1nθîθi.

Use Cases

The mean signed difference is often useful when the estimations θî are biased from the true values θi in a certain direction. If the estimator that produces the θî values is unbiased, then MSD(θî)=0. However, if the estimations θî are produced by a biased estimator, then the mean signed difference is a useful tool to understand the direction of the estimator's bias.

See also


References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Harris, D. J.; Crouse, J. D. (1993). "A Study of Criteria Used in Equating". Applied Measurement in Education. 6 (3): 203. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0603_3.
  2. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Willmott, C. J. (1982). "Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 63 (11): 1310. Bibcode:1982BAMS...63.1309W. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:SCOTEO>2.0.CO;2.


Template:Asbox