Qualitative Research (journal)
Template:Short descriptionTemplate:Infobox journal/Bluebook checkTemplate:Infobox journal/ISO 4 checkTemplate:Infobox journal/MathSciNet checkTemplate:Infobox journal/NLM checkTemplate:Infobox journal/Former checkPage Module:Infobox/styles.css has no content.
| Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:InfoboxImage/data' not found. | |
| Discipline | Research Methods |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Edited by | Bella Dicks, Karen Henwood, William Housley |
| Publication details | |
| History | 2001-present |
| Publisher | |
| Frequency | Template:Infobox journal/frequency |
| 3.141 (2018) | |
| Standard abbreviations Template:Infobox journal/Abbreviation search | |
| ISO 4 | Qual. Res. |
| IndexingTemplate:Infobox journal/Indexing search | |
| ISSN | 1468-7941 (print) 1741-3109 (web) |
| LCCN | 2009233391 |
| OCLC no. | 47226463 |
| Links | |
Script error: No such module "Check for conflicting parameters".
Qualitative Research is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal covering qualitative research methods in the fields of sociology and other social sciences. It was established in 2001 and is published by SAGE Publications. The founding editors were Sara Delamont and Paul Atkinson.[1] The current editors-in-chief are Bella Dicks, Karen Henwood, and William Housley (Cardiff University).
Abstracting and indexing
The journal is abstracted and indexed in Scopus, and the Social Sciences Citation Index. According to the Journal Citation Reports, its 2023 impact factor was 3.2.[2]
2022 retraction of a research note
On April 26, 2022, the journal published a "research note" by Karl Andersson, a PhD student and publisher of pederastic magazine Destroyer, with the title "I am not alone – we are all alone: Using masturbation as an ethnographic method in research on shota subculture in Japan".[3] The note received negative attention from academics and journalists in August 2022, prompting the journal to launch an investigation and remove the note.[4][5][6] On August 22, 2022, the journal retracted the note, explaining that while it "has systems in place to flag ethical concerns raised by article submissions prior to review, those same systems do not fully extend to note submissions", that the "two peer reviewers who considered the note did not raise ethical concerns", and that Andersson explained that "the work described in this note was carried out as a piece of independent research in Germany, without institutional ethical oversight".[7] The controversy prompted Greater Manchester Police to investigate the case, and SAGE to review its submission processes.[8] In a paper published in Publishing Research Quarterly on September 14, 2022, sociologist Casey Brienza argued that the retraction has "troubling implications for freedom of speech".[9][10] After an internal investigation, the University of Manchester ended its association with the controversial researcher in 2023.[11]
References
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Sara Delamont staff profile". Cardiff University. Archived from the original on 6 June 2023. Retrieved 28 March 2017.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Qualitative Research". SageJournals. Retrieved 2025-05-27.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Andersson, Karl (2022). "I am not alone – we are all alone: Using masturbation as an ethnographic method in research on shota subculture in Japan". Qualitative Research. 22 (6): NP4–NP6. doi:10.1177/14687941221096600. (Retracted, see Script error: No such module "CS1 identifiers".)
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.David Batty (August 11, 2022). "University investigates PhD student's paper on masturbating to comics of 'young boys'". The Guardian. Retrieved August 12, 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Cole, Samantha (August 13, 2022). "A Researcher Jerked Off to Underage Japanese Cartoon Boys and Published His Findings in an Academic Journal". Motherboard. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Flaherty, Colleen (August 15, 2022). "'Trash Fire'". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved August 22, 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Retraction Notice: "I am not alone – we are all alone: Using masturbation as an ethnographic method in research on shota subculture in Japan"". Qualitative Research. 22 (6): NP2–NP3. August 22, 2022. doi:10.1177/14687941221122713.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Inge, Sophie (20 September 2022). "Sage reviews its processes after retracting masturbation study". Research Professional News. Retrieved 17 October 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Brienza, Casey (2022). "The Masturbation Article Affair: Japanese Manga, Scholarly Publishing, and the Twenty-First Century Politics of Censorship". Publishing Research Quarterly. 39 (2): 132–146. doi:10.1007/s12109-022-09916-y.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Grove, Jack (October 4, 2022). "Retraction of masturbation study 'troubling for free speech'". Times Higher Education. Retrieved October 28, 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Jack Grove (September 14, 2023). "Manchester boots out masturbation paper PhD student". Times Higher Education. Retrieved September 25, 2023.
