Red Sea Dam
Script error: No such module "Type in location".Page Module:Infobox/styles.css has no content.
| Red Sea Dam | |
|---|---|
| Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:InfoboxImage/data' not found. The proposal is to dam the narrow inlet to the Red Sea, shown at the bottom-right of the image. | |
| Script error: No such module "Infobox mapframe". | |
| Location | Djibouti Yemen |
| Coordinates | Lua error: callParserFunction: function "#coordinates" was not found. |
| Dam and spillways | |
| Impounds | Bab-el-Mandeb Strait |
| Length | 29 km (18 mi) |
| Power Station | |
| Installed capacity | 50,000 MW |
Expression error: Unexpected < operatorScript error: No such module "Check for conflicting parameters".
The Red Sea Dam is a speculative macro-engineering proposal put forward in 2007 by a group of scientists and engineers.[1] Although the authors' intentions are to explore "the ethical and environmental dilemmas and some of the political implications of macro-engineering", the proposal has attracted both criticism and ridicule.[2]
Proposal
The idea is to dam the Red Sea at its southern end where the Bab-al-Mandab Strait is only 29 km (18 mi) wide. Natural evaporation would rapidly lower the level of the enclosed Red Sea, by about 2.1 meters per year (6.8 feet per year).[3] Water rushing back into the sea would then drive turbines to generate electricity. The dam would have the potential to generate 50 gigawatts of emissions-free hydroelectric power. In comparison, the largest nuclear power plant in the United States has an output of 3.2 gigawatts.[4]
Implications
The proposal's authors point out that "Macro-engineering projects of this size cause massive destruction of existing ecologies", a point emphasized by critics[5] who note the damage caused by current, far smaller schemes.
The authors also note the benefits of the project. Besides helping to satisfy the region's growing energy needs, there are environmental benefits to the scheme: "On the positive side of the environmental scale, however, are the big reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and the reduced pace of fossil hydrocarbon resource exhaustion".
Peter Bosshard,[6] policy director of International Rivers in California, an anti-dam organization, condemned the scheme as ludicrous.
See also
Lua error in mw.title.lua at line 404: bad argument #2 to 'title.new' (unrecognized namespace name 'Portal').
References
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ Power from closing the Red Sea: Economic and ecological costs and benefits following the isolation of the Red Sea by Roelof Dirk Schuiling, Viorel Badescu, Richard B. Cathcart, Jihan Seoud, Jaap C. Hanekamp
- ^ New Scientist critique
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Andrea Thompson published (2007-12-06). "Dam on Red Sea Would Harm Environment". livescience.com. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Ling, Frank. "Dam the Red Sea for power?". CNET. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
- ^ Live Science on the environmental impact
- ^ Red Sea mega-dam would be 'irresponsible' New Scientist, 07 December 2007 by Phil McKenna
External links
- Gibraltar Strait Dam Macroprojects Script error: No such module "webarchive". by Richard Cathcart, one of the authors of the Red Sea Dam proposal.
