Humane King Sutra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Scripture for Humane Kingss)

Template:Short description

Page Module:Message box/ambox.css has no content.

The Humane King Sutra (Chinese: Script error: No such module "Lang".; pinyin: Script error: No such module "lang".; Template:Langx; rōmaji: Script error: No such module "lang".; Template:Langx; romaja: Script error: No such module "lang".; Template:Langx) is found in Taisho No. 245 and 246. Many scholars have suspected this sutra to be composed in China but this viewpoint is not universally agreed upon.[1]Template:Rp[note 1] There are two versions: the first is called the Humane King Perfection of Wisdom Sutra (仁王般若波羅蜜經), while the second is called the Humane King State-Protection Perfection of Wisdom Sutra (仁王護國般若波羅蜜經), more idiomatically the Prajnaparamita Scripture for Humane Kings Who Wish to Protect their States.[2] Both sutras are found in the prajnaparamita section of the Taisho Tripitaka.

This sutra is unusual in the fact that its target audience, rather than being either lay practitioners or the community of monks and nuns, is the rulership (i.e. monarchs, presidents, prime ministers, etc.). Thus, for example, where the interlocutors in most scriptures are arhats or bodhisattvas, the discussants in this text are the kings of the sixteen ancient regions of India. The foregrounded teachings, rather than being meditation and wisdom, are "humaneness" and "forbearance" or "ksanti", these being the most applicable religious values for the governance of a Buddhist state. Hence today in some Chinese temples, the sutra is used during prayers on behalf of the government and the country.

A second translation from a Sanskrit text was carried out a few centuries after the appearance of the original version, by the monk Amoghavajra (Bukong 不空), one of the most important figures in the Chinese Zhenyan tradition, as well as a patriarch in the Shingon school of Japan. This second version of the text (仁王護國般若波羅蜜經, T 246.8.834-845) is similar to the original version (仁王般若波羅蜜經, T 245.8.825-834), the translation of which was attributed to Kumārajīva, but it contains new sections that include teachings on mandala, mantra, and dhāraṇī.

Themes

One theme of the sutra is impermanence. A passage which is popular in Japan is the Script error: No such module "Nihongo". Script error: No such module "Nihongo"., which in full reads Script error: No such module "Nihongo"., and is analogous to sic transit gloria mundi in the West. This is famously quoted in the first line of The Tale of the Heike, whose latter half reads: Script error: No such module "Nihongo"..[3]

Translations

There are two classical Chinese translations extant:

  • the 仁王護國般若波羅蜜經 Renwang Huguo Bore Boluomi Jing (trans. by Kumārajīva in 410-412).[4][5]
  • the 仁王護國般若波羅蜜多經 Renwang Huguo Bore Boluomiduo Jing (trans. by Amoghavajra in 765-766).[6][7] Amogavajra translated the mantras.

The discovery of the Old Translated Inwanggyeong (구역인왕경;舊譯仁王經) in Gugyeol in the mid-1970s contributed to Middle Korean studies.[8]

See also

Notes

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Yang p.85 said :
    'Firstly in Huili's Records of the Tang Dynasty Tripitaka Master of the Great Ci'en Monastery it states that Xuanzang (602-664 CE) was requested by the King of Gaochang to give a Dharma Teaching based on the Humane King Sutra thereby implying the Humane King Sutra was known outside China'
    Yang p. 83-85 said :
    'there were altogether four translations – two of which were lost; none of the translations were suspected to be apocryphal in the traditional catalogs – only to have unknown translators'
    Yang p.86 said :
    'the records regarding the translation by Amoghavajra clearly states he worked from a Sanskrit text'

References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Yang 2016
  2. ^ Orzech 2002, p. 63
  3. ^ Chapter 1.1, Helen Craig McCullough's translation
  4. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Taisho Tripitaka Vol. 8, No. 245, CBETA". Archived from the original on 2005-03-07. Retrieved 2009-02-28.
  5. ^ Orzech 1989, p.18
  6. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Taisho Tripitaka Vol. 8, No. 246, CBETA". Archived from the original on 2005-03-07. Retrieved 2009-02-28.
  7. ^ Orzech 1989, p.18
  8. ^ On the Chinese Transcriptions of Northeastern Eurasian Languages

Further reading

  • Conze, Edward (1974). The Short Prajnaparamita Texts. [esp. The Sutra on Perfect Wisdom Which Explains How Benevolent Kings May Protect Their Countries] pp. 165–183. Template:ISBN
  • Orzech, Charles D. (1989). Puns on the Humane King: Analogy and Application in an East Asian Apocryphon, Journal of the American Oriental Society 109 /1, 17-24
  • Orzech, Charles D. Politics and Transcendent Wisdom: The Scripture for Humane Kings in the Creation of Chinese Buddhism. Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008. Template:ISBN
  • Orzech, Charles D. (2002). Metaphor, Translation, and the Construction of Kingship in The Scripture for Humane Kings and the Mahāmāyūrī Vidyārājñī Sūtra, Cahiers d'Extrême-Asie 13, 55-83
  • Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Yang, Weizhong (杨维中) (2016). 《仁王般若经》的汉译及其“疑伪”之争 [The Chinese Translation of 'The Humane King Perfection of Wisdom Sutra' and Arguments Regarding its Suspicious or Apocryphal [Origins]'] (in 中文(简体)). Vol. 7. Journal of Southwest University – Humanities and Social Sciences Edition. pp. 81–86.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Authority control/config' not found.