Cropping system

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:Short description

The term cropping system refers to the crops, crop sequences and management techniques used on a particular agricultural field over a period of years. It includes all spatial and temporal aspects of managing an agricultural system. Historically, cropping systems have been designed to maximise yield, but modern agriculture is increasingly concerned with promoting environmental sustainability in cropping systems. [1]

Crop choice

Crop choice is central to any cropping system. In evaluating whether a given crop will be planted, a farmer must consider its profitability, adaptability to changing conditions, resistance to disease, and requirement for specific technologies during growth or harvesting.[2] They must also consider the prevailing environmental conditions on their farm, and how the crop will fit in with other elements of their production system.[2]

Crop organisation and rotation

Monoculture is the practice of growing a single crop in a given area, where polyculture involves growing multiple crops in an area. Monocropping (or continuous monoculture) is a system in which the same crop is grown in the same area for a number of growing seasons. Many modern farms are made up of a number of fields, which can be cultivated separately and thus can be used in a crop rotation sequence. Crop rotation has been employed for thousands of years and has been widely found to increase yield and prevent harmful changes to the soil environment that limit productivity in the long term.[3] Although the specific mechanisms regulating that effect are not fully understood,[4] they are thought to be related to differential effects on soil chemical, physical, and microbiological properties by different crops.[5] By affecting the soil in different ways, crops in a rotation help to stabilise changes in the properties. Another consideration is that many agricultural pests are species-specific and so having a given species present in a field only some of the time helps to prevent populations of pests from growing.[6]

The organisation of individual plants in a field is also variable and typically depends on the crop being grown. Many vegetables, cereals, and fruits are grown in contiguous rows, which are wide enough to allow cultivation (or mowing, in the case of fruits) without damaging crop plants. Other systems aim for maximum plant density and have no such organisation. Forages are grown in that manner since animal traffic is expected, and maximum plant density is required for their nutrition, as are cover crops, since their purpose of competing with weeds and preventing soil erosion depends largely on density.[7]

Residue management

Managing crop residues is important in most systems. Some of the nutrients contained in these dead tissues are made available to crops during decomposition,[8] reducing the need for fertiliser inputs. Leaving residues in place also increases the soil organic matter (SOM), which has a number of benefits.[9] Specific management practices can have a number of other impacts.

Tillage

Rice tillage. Valencian Museum of Ethnology.

Tillage is the primary method by which farmers manage crop residues. Different types of tillage result in varying amounts of crop residue being incorporated into the soil profile. Conventional or intensive tillage typically leaves less than 15% of crop residues on a field, reduced tillage leaves 15–30%, and conservation tillage systems leave at least 30% on the soil surface.[10] The differences observed across these systems are diverse, and there is still considerable debate concerning their relative economic and environmental impact, but a number of widely reported benefits have led to a major shift towards reduced tillage in modern cropping systems.[11]

In general, leaving residues on the soil surface results in a mulching effect which helps control erosion,[12] prevents excessive evaporation, and suppresses weeds,[13] but may necessitate the use of specialised planting equipment.[14] Incorporating residues into the soil profile results in rapid decomposition by soil microorganisms,[15] which makes planting easier and in some cases could mean that nutrients will be made available to plants sooner, but limited erosion control and weed suppression are provided.

Under reduced or no-tillage, limited exposure to soil microorganisms can slow the rate of decomposition thus delaying the conversion of organic polymers to carbon dioxide and increasing the amount of carbon sequestered by the system,[16][17][18] although in poorly aerated soils this may be offset in part by an increase in nitrous oxide emissions.[19]

Burning

In some systems residues are burned. This is a fast and cheap way to clear a field in preparation for the next planting, and can assist with pest control, but has a number of drawbacks: organic matter (carbon) is lost from the system, soil is exposed and becomes more susceptible to erosion, and the smoke produced is an atmospheric pollutant.[20] In many parts of the world, this practice is restricted or banned.[21]

Removal

Especially in developing countries, crop residues may be removed and used for human or animal consumption, or other purposes.[22] This provides a secondary source of sustenance or income, but precludes the benefits associated with leaving residues within the system.

Nutrient management

Nutrients are depleted during crop growth, and must be renewed or replaced in order for agriculture to continue on a piece of land. This is generally accomplished with fertilisers, which can be organic or synthetic in origin. A large component of the organic farming movement is a preference for organic-source fertilisers.

Excessive fertilisation is not only costly, but can harm crops and have a number of environmental consequences.[23] Therefore, there is considerable interest in developing nutrient management plans for individual plots which attempt to optimise fertiliser application rates.

Water management

Soil moisture content is an important factor in plant development, and must be maintained within a range throughout the growing period. The range of tolerable moisture conditions varies from crop to crop. Irrigation and fine-textured amendments can be used to increase soil moisture, whereas coarser-textured amendments and technologies such as tile drainage can be used to decrease it.[24][25]

See also

References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Blanco, Humberto (2010). Principles of Soil Conservation and Management. Springer Science. pp. 167–193. ISBN 978-9048185290.
  2. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Factors in Crop Selection". CropsReview.Com. Retrieved 2016-11-23.
  3. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bullock, D. G. (1992-01-01). "Crop rotation". Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 11 (4): 309–326. Bibcode:1992CRvPS..11..309B. doi:10.1080/07352689209382349. ISSN 0735-2689.
  4. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Alianza SIDALC". www.sidalc.net. Retrieved 2016-11-23.
  5. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Why Is Crop Rotation Important?". Archived from the original on 2018-11-07. Retrieved 2016-11-23.
  6. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Brueckmann, Dr. Stefan. "Crop rotation". www.oisat.org. Retrieved 2016-11-23.
  7. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Brennan, Eric; Smith, Richard (2005). "Winter Cover Crop Growth and Weed Suppression on the Central Coast of California". Weed Technology. 19 (4): 1017–1024. Bibcode:2005WeedT..19.1017B. doi:10.1614/WT-04-246R1.1. Archived from the original on 2017-03-05. Retrieved 2016-11-23 – via NALDC.
  8. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."The importance of soil organic matter". www.fao.org. Retrieved 2016-11-28.
  9. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bot, Alexandra (2005). "The Importance of Soil Organic Matter" (PDF). FAO. Retrieved November 23, 2016.
  10. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Tillage Type Definitions". www.ctic.purdue.edu. Archived from the original on 2016-11-24. Retrieved 2016-11-23.
  11. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Huggins, David; Reganold, John (2008). "No-Till: The Quiet Revolution" (PDF). Scientific American. 299 (1). USDA: 70. Bibcode:2008SciAm.299a..70H. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0708-70. PMID 18623967. Retrieved 28 November 2016.
  12. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Paul W. Unger (1994). Managing Agricultural Residues. CRC Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-87371-730-4.
  13. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Amoroso, Gabriele; Frangi, Piero; Piatti, Riccardo; Fini, Alessio; Ferrini, Francesco (2010-12-01). "Effect of Mulching on Plant and Weed Growth, Substrate Water Content, and Temperature in Container-grown Giant Arborvitae". HortTechnology. 20 (6): 957–962. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.20.6.957. ISSN 1063-0198.
  14. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Residue management". wheatdoctor.org. Retrieved 2016-11-29.
  15. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Coppens, Filip; Garnier, Patricia; Findeling, Antoine; Merckx, Roel; Recous, Sylvie (2007-09-01). "Decomposition of mulched versus incorporated crop residues: Modelling with PASTIS clarifies interactions between residue quality and location". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 39 (9): 2339–2350. Bibcode:2007SBiBi..39.2339C. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.04.005.
  16. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Abiven, Samuel; Recous, Sylvie (2007-02-07). "Mineralisation of crop residues on the soil surface or incorporated in the soil under controlled conditions" (PDF). Biology and Fertility of Soils. 43 (6): 849–852. Bibcode:2007BioFS..43..849A. doi:10.1007/s00374-007-0165-2. ISSN 0178-2762.
  17. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Kahlon, Meharban Singh; Lal, Rattan; Ann-Varughese, Merrie (2013-01-01). "Twenty two years of tillage and mulching impacts on soil physical characteristics and carbon sequestration in Central Ohio". Soil and Tillage Research. 126: 151–158. Bibcode:2013STilR.126..151K. doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.08.001.
  18. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bayer, C.; Martin-Neto, L.; Mielniczuk, J.; Pavinato, A.; Dieckow, J. (2006-04-01). "Carbon sequestration in two Brazilian Cerrado soils under no-till". Soil and Tillage Research. 86 (2): 237–245. Bibcode:2006STilR..86..237B. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.02.023.
  19. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Rochette, Philippe (2008-09-01). "No-till only increases N2O emissions in poorly-aerated soils". Soil and Tillage Research. 101 (1–2): 97–100. doi:10.1016/j.still.2008.07.011.
  20. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Stubble Burning". Agriculture Victoria. 29 February 2016. Archived from the original on 6 October 2018. Retrieved 14 October 2016.
  21. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."The Crop Residues (Burning) Regulations 1993". 1993.
  22. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Prasad, Rajendra; Power, J. F. (1991-01-01). Stewart, B. A. (ed.). Advances in Soil Science. Springer New York. pp. 205–251. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3030-4_5. ISBN 9781461277682.
  23. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."How Do Fertilizers Affect the Environment". Environment News South Africa. 2015-04-20. Retrieved 2016-11-29.
  24. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Agricultural Irrigation Systems". www.vandenbussche.com. Retrieved 2016-11-29.
  25. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Planning an agricultural subsurface drainage system : Agricultural Drainage : University of Minnesota Extension". www.extension.umn.edu. Archived from the original on 2016-11-29. Retrieved 2016-11-29.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Authority control/config' not found.

Retrieved from "http://cosmopedia.co/index.php?title=Cropping_system&oldid=7508985"