Roundhead
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "about". Template:DMCA Template:DMCA Template:Use shortened footnotes
Page Module:Infobox/styles.css has no content.
Parliamentarians | |
|---|---|
| Leaders | Oliver Cromwell Richard Cromwell John Bradshaw Thomas Fairfax |
| Founded | Script error: No such module "Date time". |
| Dissolved | Script error: No such module "Date time". |
| Merged into | Whigs |
| Ideology | Parliamentary supremacy Popular sovereignty Factions: Constitutional monarchism Republicanism Universal suffrage (Levellers) Proto-socialism (Diggers) |
| Political position | Left-wing |
| Religion | Protestantism |
| Party flag | |
| Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:InfoboxImage/data' not found. | |
| Page Template:Hlist/styles.css has no content. | |
The Parliamentarians, commonly called Roundheads by their enemies and in modern historiography, were the supporters of the Parliament of England during the English Civil War (1642–1651). They fought against King Charles I of England and his supporters, known as the Cavaliers or Royalists, who claimed rule by absolute monarchy and the principle of the divine right of kings.[1] The goal of the Roundheads was to give to Parliament the supreme control over executive administration of England.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
Beliefs

Most Roundheads sought constitutional monarchy in place of the absolute monarchy sought by Charles;[2] however, at the end of the English Civil War in 1649, public antipathy towards the king was high enough to allow republican leaders such as Oliver Cromwell to abolish the monarchy completely and establish the Commonwealth of England.
The Roundhead commander-in-chief of the first Civil War, Thomas Fairfax, remained a supporter of constitutional monarchy, as did many other Roundhead leaders such as Edward Montagu, 2nd Earl of Manchester, and Robert Devereux, 3rd Earl of Essex; however, this party was outmanoeuvred by the more politically adept Cromwell and his radicals, who had the backing of the New Model Army and took advantage of Charles' perceived betrayal of England in his alliance with the Scottish against Parliament.[3][4][5][dubious – discuss]
England's many Puritans and Presbyterians were almost invariably Roundhead supporters, as were many smaller religious groups such as the Independents (although in the English territory of the Somers Isles, or Bermuda, Episcopalians and Presbyterians united as Royalists against the Independents).[6][7][8] However, a number of Roundheads were members of the Church of England, as were most Cavaliers. Roundhead political factions included the proto-anarchist/socialist Diggers, the diverse group known as the Levellers and the apocalyptic Christian movement of the Fifth Monarchists.
Origins and background of the term
Some Puritans (but by no means all of them) wore their hair closely cropped round the head or flat. This created an obvious contrast between them and the men of courtly fashion, who wore long ringlets.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. During the war and for a time afterwards, Roundhead was a term of derision,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. and in the New Model Army it was a punishable offence to call a fellow soldier a Roundhead.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. This contrasted with Cavalier, a word used to describe supporters of the Royalist cause, but which also started out as a pejorative term. The first proponents used it to compare members of the Royalist party with Spanish Caballeros who had abused Dutch Protestants during the reign of Elizabeth I. However, unlike Roundhead, Cavalier was later embraced by those who were the target of the epithet and used by them to describe themselves.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.

"Roundheads" appears to have been first used as a term of derision toward the end of 1641, when the debates in Parliament in the Clergy Act 1640 were causing riots at Westminster. The Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition quotes a contemporary authority's description of the crowd that gathered there: "They had the hair of their heads very few of them longer than their ears, whereupon it came to pass that those who usually with their cries attended at Westminster were by a nickname called Roundheads".Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The demonstrators included London apprentices, for whom Roundhead was a term of derision, because the regulations which they had agreed to included a provision for closely cropped hair.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
According to John Rushworth, the word was first used on 27 December 1641 by a disbanded officer named David Hide. During a riot, Hide is reported to have drawn his sword and said he would "cut the throat of those round-headed dogs that bawled against bishops";[9] however, Richard Baxter ascribes the origin of the term to a remark made by Queen Henrietta Maria, the wife of Charles I, at the trial of Thomas Wentworth, 1st Earl of Strafford, earlier that year. Referring to John Pym, she asked who the roundheaded man was.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The principal advisor to Charles II, Edward Hyde, 1st Earl of Clarendon, remarked on the matter, "and from those contestations the two terms of Roundhead and Cavalier grew to be received in discourse, ... they who were looked upon as servants to the king being then called Cavaliers, and the other of the rabble contemned and despised under the name of Roundheads."[10]
After the Anglican Archbishop William Laud made a statute in 1636 instructing all clergy to wear short hair, many Puritans rebelled to show their contempt for his authority and began to grow their hair even longer (as can be seen on their portraits)[11] though they continued to be known as Roundheads. The longer hair was more common among the "Independent" and "high-ranking" Puritans, which included Cromwell, especially toward the end of the Protectorate, while the "Presbyterian" faction, and the military rank and file, continued to reject long hair. By the end of that period, some Independent Puritans were again derisively using the term Roundhead to refer to the Presbyterian Puritans.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
Roundhead remained in use to describe those with republican tendencies until the Exclusion Crisis of 1678–1681, when the term was superseded by "Whig", initially another term with pejorative connotations. Likewise, during the Exclusion Bill crisis, the term Cavalier was replaced with "Tory", an Irish term introduced by their opponents that was also initially a pejorative term.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
Notes
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Krowke, André. "Monarchy versus Parliament: England in the 17th century". rfb.bildung-rp.de.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Stewart, Laura. "Oliver Cromwell: a Scottish perspective". The Cromwell Association.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Plant, David (November 2008). "The Engagement, 1647–48". BCW Project.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Morrill, John (February 2011). "Oliver Cromwell". BBC.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Tanksalvala, Sarah (2 September 2021). "English Civil Wars 23: Empire". americanhistorypodcast.net. Sarah Tanksalvala. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
in England, Parliament had purged the Somers Islands Company of members who opposed the Commonwealth, so its remaining members pushed Bermuda into submission. They also allowed the Eleutherian Adventurers to return to Bermuda from the Bahamas, and pushed Governor Forster to punish the people who had revolted after the regicide … or tried. Forster evaded their questions, feigned ignorance, and downplayed both the revolt and the previous governor's participation in it. He protected his predecessor, and the rebels, from the consequences demanded by the company on Parliament's behalf, and to his credit, Bermudians lived peacefully thanks to his leadership.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Tanksalvala, Sarah (26 October 2021). "English Civil Wars 27: Witch trials in the Devil's Isles". americanhistorypodcast.net. Sarah Tanksalvala. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
If you've been listening, and if you remember, Bermuda was the colony that tore itself apart first when war broke out in England. The only other colony that suffered the same sort of division was Maryland, but Maryland had so many external issues that it's not even a comparable situation. By 1651, various political and religious factions in Bermuda had spent about a decade seizing power from each other, and then rebelling, imprisoning, banishing and otherwise abusing each other. Governors had been rotated every few months by a company that was, one, completely befuddled, two almost as passionately divided in England as its colony was in America, and three, which colonists were barely listening to at this point.
There was a violent rebellion after King Charles was beheaded, and that prompted a purging of the company within England, as well as orders that the Independents who had been exiled and founded Eleutheria in the Bahamas be allowed to return. Like everywhere else in Commonwealth-era England and America, people could only vote if they signed an allegiance to the king-free government, which Bermuda's Presbyterians refused to do for over a year. And so, after a decade of unbridled animosity, this had given one side complete control over the island. And to their limited credit, the Company realized that this might be a problem. So, in order to try to address this issue, kind of? They reinstated Governor Josias Forster, who was known for being the island's most moderate of moderates. - ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Lefroy, John Henry (1981). Memorials of the Discovery and Early Settlement of the Bermudas or Somers Islands 1515-1685, Volume I. Bermuda: The Bermuda Historical Society and The Bermuda National Trust (the first edition having been published in 1877, with funds provided by the Government of Bermuda), printed in Canada by The University of Toronto Press.
- ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. cites Rushworth Historical Collections
- ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. cites Clarendon History of the Rebellion, volume IV. p. 121.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Powell, Margaret K.; Roach, Joseph (10 December 2020). A Cultural History of Hair in the Age of Enlightenment. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-350-08795-8.
References
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Macaulay, Thomas Babington (1856). The History of England from the Accession of James II. Vol. 1. New York: Harper & Brothers. p. 105. ISBN 0-543-93129-3.
{{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) - Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hanbury, Benjamin (1844). Historical Memorials Relating to the Independents Or Congregationalists: From Their Rise to the Restoration of the Monarchy. Vol. 3. pp. 118, 635.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hunt, John (2010) [1870]. Religious Thought in England, from the Reformation to the End of Last Century; A Contribution to the History of Theology. Vol. 2. General Books LLC. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-150-98096-1.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Ridley, Jasper (1976). The Roundheads. London: Constable. ISBN 978-0-09461-230-3.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Roberts, Chris (2006). Heavy Words Lightly Thrown: The Reason Behind Rhyme. Thorndike Press. ISBN 0-7862-8517-6.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Worden, Blair (2009). The English Civil Wars 1640–1660. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-100694-9.
Attribution
- This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Script error: No such module "template wrapper".
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Authority control/config' not found.