All models are wrong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:Short description "All models are wrong" is a common aphorism in statistics. It is often expanded as "All models are wrong, but some are useful". The aphorism acknowledges that statistical models always fall short of the complexities of reality but can still be useful nonetheless. The aphorism is generally attributed to George E. P. Box, a British statistician, although the underlying concept predates Box's writings.

History

The phrase is attributed to George Box

The phrase "all models are wrong" was attributed[1] to George Box who used the phrase in a 1976 paper to refer to the limitations of models, arguing that while no model is ever completely accurate, simpler models can still provide valuable insights if applied judiciously.[2]Template:Rp

In their 1983 book on generalized linear models, Peter McCullagh and John Nelder stated that while modeling in science is a creative process, some models are better than others, even though none can claim eternal truth.[3][4] In 1996, an Applied Statistician's Creed was proposed by M.R. Nester, which incorporated the aphorism as a central tenet.[1]

The longer form appears on in a 1987 book by Box and Norman Draper in a section "The Use of Approximating Functions,":

"The fact that the polynomial is an approximation does not necessarily detract from its usefulness because all models are approximations. Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful."[5]Template:Rp

Discussions

Box used the aphorism again in 1979, where he expanded on the idea by discussing how models serve as useful approximations, despite failing to perfectly describe empirical phenomena.[6] He reiterated this sentiment in his later works, where he discussed how models should be judged based on their utility rather than their absolute correctness.[7][8]

David Cox, in a 1995 commentary, argued that stating all models are wrong is unhelpful, as models by their nature simplify reality. He emphasized that statistical models, like other scientific models, aim to capture important aspects of systems through idealized representations.[9]

In their 2002 book on statistical model selection, Burnham and Anderson reiterated Box's statement, noting that while models are simplifications of reality, they vary in usefulness, from highly useful to essentially useless.[10]

J. Michael Steele used the analogy of city maps to explain that models, like maps, serve practical purposes despite their limitations, emphasizing that certain models, though simplified, are not necessarily wrong.[11] In response, Andrew Gelman acknowledged Steele's point but defended the usefulness of the aphorism, particularly in drawing attention to the inherent imperfections of models.[12]

Philosopher Peter Truran, in a 2013 essay, discussed how seemingly incompatible models can make accurate predictions by representing different aspects of the same phenomenon, illustrating the point with an example of two observers viewing a cylindrical object from different angles.[13]

In 2014, David Hand reiterated that models are meant to aid in understanding or decision-making about the real world, a point emphasized by Box's famous remark.[14]

See also

Notes

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Nester, M. R. (1996), "An applied statistician's creed" (PDF), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 45 (4): 401–410, doi:10.2307/2986064, JSTOR 2986064.
  2. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Box, George E. P. (1976), "Science and statistics" (PDF), Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71 (356): 791–799, doi:10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949.
  3. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McCullagh, P.; Nelder, J. A. (1983), Generalized Linear Models, Chapman & Hall, §1.1.4.
  4. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McCullagh, P.; Nelder, J. A. (1989), Generalized Linear Models (second ed.), Chapman & Hall, §1.1.4.
  5. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Box, George E. P.; Draper, Norman Richard (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-81033-9.
  6. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Box, G. E. P. (1979), "Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building", in Launer, R. L.; Wilkinson, G. N. (eds.), Robustness in Statistics, Academic Press, pp. 201–236, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-438150-6.50018-2, ISBN 978-1-4832-6336-6
  7. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Box, G. E. P.; Draper, N. R. (1987), Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley & Sons.
  8. ^ The relatedness of Shewhart's quotation with the aphorism "all models are wrong" is noted by Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found..
  9. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Cox, D. R. (1995), "Comment on "Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference"", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 158: 455–456.
  10. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Burnham, K. P.; Anderson, D. R. (2002), Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed.), Springer-Verlag, §1.2.5.
  11. ^ Steele, J. M., "Models: Masterpieces and Lame Excuses".
  12. ^ Gelman, A. (12 June 2008), "Some thoughts on the saying, 'All models are wrong, but some are useful'".
  13. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Truran, P. (2013), "Models: Useful but Not True", Practical Applications of the Philosophy of Science, SpringerBriefs in Philosophy, Springer, pp. 61–67, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00452-5_10, ISBN 978-3-319-00451-8.
  14. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hand, D. J. (2014), "Wonderful examples, but let's not close our eyes", Statistical Science, 29: 98–100, arXiv:1405.4986, doi:10.1214/13-STS446.

References

Page Template:Refbegin/styles.css has no content.

Further reading