Automatic group
In mathematics, an automatic group is a finitely generated group equipped with several finite-state automata. These automata represent the Cayley graph of the group. That is, they can tell whether a given word representation of a group element is in a "canonical form" and can tell whether two elements given in canonical words differ by a generator.[1]
More precisely, let G be a group and A be a finite set of generators. Then an automatic structure of G with respect to A is a set of finite-state automata:[2]
- the word-acceptor, which accepts for every element of G at least one word in representing it;
- multipliers, one for each , which accept a pair (w1, w2), for words wi accepted by the word-acceptor, precisely when in G.
The property of being automatic does not depend on the set of generators.[3]
Properties
Automatic groups have word problem solvable in quadratic time. More strongly, a given word can actually be put into canonical form in quadratic time, based on which the word problem may be solved by testing whether the canonical forms of two words represent the same element (using the multiplier for ).[4]
Automatic groups are characterized by the fellow traveler property.[5] Let denote the distance between in the Cayley graph of . Then, G is automatic with respect to a word acceptor L if and only if there is a constant such that for all words which differ by at most one generator, the distance between the respective prefixes of u and v is bounded by C. In other words, where for the k-th prefix of (or itself if ). This means that when reading the words synchronously, it is possible to keep track of the difference between both elements with a finite number of states (the neighborhood of the identity with diameter C in the Cayley graph).
Examples of automatic groups
The automatic groups include:
- Finite groups. To see this take the regular language to be the set of all words in the finite group.
- Euclidean groups
- All finitely generated Coxeter groups[6]
- Geometrically finite groups
Examples of non-automatic groups
- Baumslag–Solitar groups
- Non-Euclidean nilpotent groups
- Not every CAT(0) group is biautomatic[7][8]
Biautomatic groups
A group is biautomatic if it has two multiplier automata, for left and right multiplication by elements of the generating set, respectively. A biautomatic group is clearly automatic.[9]
Examples include:
- Hyperbolic groups.[10]
- Any Artin group of finite type, including braid groups.[10]
Automatic structures
The idea of describing algebraic structures with finite-automata can be generalized from groups to other structures.[11] For instance, it generalizes naturally to automatic semigroups.[12]
References
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Epstein, David B. A.; Cannon, James W.; Holt, Derek F.; Levy, Silvio V. F.; Paterson, Michael S.; Thurston, William P. (1992), Word Processing in Groups, Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, ISBN 0-86720-244-0.
- ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found., Section 2.3, "Automatic Groups: Definition", pp. 45–51.
- ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found., Section 2.4, "Invariance under Change of Generators", pp. 52–55.
- ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found., Theorem 2.3.10, p. 50.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Campbell, Colin M.; Robertson, Edmund F.; Ruskuc, Nik; Thomas, Richard M. (2001), "Automatic semigroups" (PDF), Theoretical Computer Science, 250 (1–2): 365–391, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(99)00151-6
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Brink and Howlett (1993), "A finiteness property and an automatic structure for Coxeter groups", Mathematische Annalen, 296, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg: 179–190, doi:10.1007/bf01445101, ISSN 0025-5831, S2CID 122177473.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Leary, I. J.; Minasyan, Ashot (2021). "Commensurating HNN extensions: nonpositive curvature and biautomaticity". Geom. Topol. 25: 1819–1860. arXiv:1907.03515. doi:10.2140/gt.2021.25.1819.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hughes, Sam; Valiunas, Motiejus (2024). "Commensurating HNN-extensions: Hierarchical hyperbolicity and biautomaticity". Comment. Math. Helv. 99 (2): 397–436. arXiv:2203.11996. doi:10.4171/CMH/572.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Birget, Jean-Camille (2000), Algorithmic problems in groups and semigroups, Trends in mathematics, Birkhäuser, p. 82, ISBN 0-8176-4130-0
- ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Charney, Ruth (1992), "Artin groups of finite type are biautomatic", Mathematische Annalen, 292: 671–683, doi:10.1007/BF01444642, S2CID 120654588
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Khoussainov, Bakhadyr; Rubin, Sasha (2002), Some Thoughts On Automatic Structures, CiteSeerX 10.1.1.7.3913
- ^ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found., Section 6.1, "Semigroups and Specialized Axioms", pp. 114–116.
Further reading
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Chiswell, Ian (2008), A Course in Formal Languages, Automata and Groups, Springer, ISBN 978-1-84800-939-4.