Corn Refiners Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:Short description

Page Module:Infobox/styles.css has no content.

Corn Refiners Association Inc
FormationTax-exempt since May 1983; 43 years ago (1983-05)
Type501(c)(6)
Purposetrade association
HeadquartersWashington, DC
President & CEO
John Bode
Revenue7,640,658 USD (2023)
Expenses7,804,378 USD (2023)
Websitecorn.org
[1]

Script error: No such module "Check for conflicting parameters".

The Corn Refiners Association (CRA) is a trade association based in Washington, D.C. It represents the corn refining industry in the United States. Corn refining encompasses the production of corn starch, corn oil, and high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS).

Issues

Antitrust law

The CRA opposed[when?] the merger of the Union Pacific and Southern Pacific railroads on the grounds it would reduce competition and raise shipping prices.[2]

Biofuels

In 2004, the CRA worked with the University of Illinois and the Agricultural Research Service to create computer models of ethanol production costs.[3]

Biotech

In 2019, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) proposed rules that would streamline the regulation of biotech crops including those that are genetically engineered. The rules would exempt such crops from regulation if the changes they introduce could have been made through traditional breeding methods. The proposed rules would give biotech firms three options: self-declaring their products as exempt, seeking an exemption letter from the UDSA, or asking the USDA to determine if the traits in question should be exempted or regulated. The CRA, along with other industry groups, strongly opposed this rule change on the grounds that trade and consumer confidence in agricultural products could be compromised.[4]

High fructose corn syrup

The CRA launched a public relations campaign in 2008 called "Changing the Conversation about High Fructose Corn Syrup" (HFCS).[5] Initial commercials stated that HFCS was "natural".[6] Later ads stated HFCS is "made from corn ... and is okay to eat in moderation".[6] In response to the claims HFCS is "natural", Michael Jacobson, executive director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest stated HFCS "is chemically or enzymatically degraded to glucose ... High-fructose corn syrup just doesn't exist in nature."[6] The claim that HFCS is safe in moderation has also been criticized, as HFCS is used in tens of thousands of products in America. Lisa McLaughlin from Time responded by saying "unless you're making a concerted effort to avoid it, it's pretty difficult to consume high-fructose corn syrup in moderation."[6]

In September 2010, the CRA applied for permission to use the name "corn sugar" in place of high fructose corn syrup on food labels for products sold in the United States. Time stated that the CRA's decision to change the name of HFCS was because HFCS had such a bad reputation.[7] In response to the proposed name change, The New York Times ran an article asking nutrition experts what they would suggest as appropriate names for HFCS. Three of the five experts recommended alternate names, including Michael Pollan who suggested "enzymatically altered corn glucose". Dr Andrew Weil recommended not changing from HFCS, calling the term corn sugar "too vague" and the CRA's attempt to change HFCS's name "Orwellian". However Dr. Barry Popkin felt that "corn sugar" was an appropriate term.[8][9] In May 2012, the Food and Drug Administration rejected the name change.[10]

In 2010, the CRA approached bloggers who run mom blogs, through the organization MomCentral.com.[11] Bloggers were extended offers of $50 Wal-Mart gift certificates in exchange for writing about a CRA sponsored seminar that made the claims that high fructose corn syrup is safe and healthy. Several prominent bloggers criticized the CRA's methods as well as the bloggers who passed on the information presented by CRA.[12]

Trade

In 1991, the Netherlands implemented trade barriers that affected American corn growers and refiners such as implementing a maximum allowable content for fat and starch that would have effectively ended the duty-free status of corn-based gluten meal by reclassifying most of it as animal feed. The tariffs would have been roughly $100-to-$175 per metric ton. The CRA opposed these trade restrictions. A compromise trade deal was reached in 1992.[13][14][15]

The CRA has expressed strong support for the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) free trade deal.[16] The CRA and other trade groups sponsored the Farmers for Free Trade Motorcade for Trade. The motorcade traveled extensively through rural areas of the United States to promote approval of the USMCA. The motorcade was intended to raise awareness of the link between free trade and farm income and influence members of Congress, especially freshman lawmakers elected in 2018.[17]

In the late 1990s, Mexico erected trade barriers on corn-based sweeteners made in the United States and then implemented a 20% tax on soft drinks not flavored with Mexican sugar in 2002. This ignited a decade long dispute. The World Trade Organization eventually ruled that the soft-drink tax was illegal. Mexico and the United States reached an agreement to phase them out starting in October 2006 and ending in zero tariffs in 2008.[18]

The CRA expressed support for the preliminary trade deal reached between the United States and China in December 2019.[19]

Leadership

As of 2020, the president and CEO of CRA was John Bode.[17][16]

Members

Members of the CRA include Archer Daniels Midland, Cargill, Ingredion, Roquette America, Inc. and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas.[20]

References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."[[:Template:Wikidata]]". Internal Revenue Service filings. ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer. {{cite web}}: URL–wikilink conflict (help)
  2. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Lang, Dan (1996). "Affections Still Alienated Off the Record, Shippers Don't Hold Their Peace About UP-SP Marriage". The Journal of Commerce.
  3. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Core, Jim (July 12, 2004). "Computer Models Help Guide Ethanol Production Research". United States Department of Agriculture. Archived from the original on September 29, 2020.
  4. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Staff (7 August 2019). "USDA plan to ease biotech regs splits industry". Agri-Pulse. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  5. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Our Mission". sweetsuprise.com. Retrieved December 23, 2010.
  6. ^ a b c d Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McLaughlin, Lisa (September 17, 2008). "Is High-Fructose Corn Syrup Really Good for You?". Time. Archived from the original on September 19, 2008. Retrieved June 19, 2010.
  7. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Melnick, Meredith (September 14, 2010). "High Fructose Corn Syrup Wants A New Name". Time. Retrieved October 27, 2010.
  8. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Parker-Pope, Tara (September 23, 2010). "Help Rename High-Fructose Corn Syrup". The New York Times. Retrieved December 23, 2010.
  9. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Weil, Andrew (September 24, 2010). "Fortunately, 'Corn Sugar' Has Become a Sticky PR Mess". The Huffington Post. Retrieved October 27, 2010.
  10. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Landa, Michael (May 31, 2012). "Response to Petition from Corn Refiners Association to Authorize 'Corn Sugar' as an Alternate Common or Usual Name for High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)". Food and Drug Administration. Archived from the original on May 31, 2012. Retrieved July 2, 2012.
  11. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Edwards, Jim (September 13, 2010). "Inside the Mommy-Blog-Industrial Complex, Where Chemical Companies Write Posts for Parents". BNET. Retrieved December 23, 2010.
  12. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Warner, Melanie (October 15, 2010). "High Fructose Corn Syrup's Latest PR Target: Mommy Bloggers". BNET. Retrieved December 23, 2010.
  13. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Crissaful, Patricia (1991). "US-Dutch Corn Gluten Fued Threatens to Embroil EC". The Journal of Commerce.
  14. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."EC Ministers Approve Gluten Limites". The Journal of Commerce. Knight-Ridder Financia. 1991.
  15. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Commins, Patricia (1992). "US, EC Reach "Cease-Fire' Pact in Gluten Dispute". The Journal of Commerce.
  16. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Senate Passes USMCA Trade Deal". Transport Topics. 16 January 2020. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  17. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."The Hagstrom Report: Farmers' Motorcade for Trade ends tour at Reagan World Trade Center". The Fence Post. 16 September 2019. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  18. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Staff (28 July 2006). "Corn Refiners Welcome HFCS Deal with Mexico". AgWeb.com.
  19. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Megan, Cassella (13 December 2019). "U.S., China strike preliminary deal". Politico. Retrieved 11 March 2020.
  20. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Corn Refiners Association (October 2010). "Corn Refiners Association Member Companies Domestic and International Plant Locations". Corn Refiners Association. Retrieved December 23, 2010.

Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Authority control/config' not found.

Retrieved from "https://cosmopedia.co/index.php?title=Corn_Refiners_Association&oldid=6745348"