Inter-State Commission
Template:Short description Template:DMCA Template:DMCA
Page Module:Infobox/styles.css has no content.
| Script error: No such module "Infobox mapframe". | |
| Commission overview | |
|---|---|
| Formed | 1912; 1983 |
| Dissolved | 1920 (de facto); 1950 (de jure); 1990 |
Superseding commission | Page Template:Plainlist/styles.css has no content. |
| Jurisdiction | Commonwealth of Australia |
Commission executive | Page Template:Plainlist/styles.css has no content.
|
Key documents | Page Template:Plainlist/styles.css has no content.
|
Script error: No such module "Check for conflicting parameters".
The Inter-State Commission, or Interstate Commission, is a defunct constitutional body under Australian law. The envisaged chief functions of the Inter-State Commission were to administer and adjudicate matters relating to interstate trade. The Commission was established in 1912, became dormant in 1920, was abolished in 1950, re-established in 1983, and absorbed into the Industry Commission in 1989.
Constitutional basis
The Constitution of Australia contains the following provisions relating to the envisaged body:
Section 73 provides that appeals on questions of law can be made on decisions of the Inter-State Commission to the High Court
Background in the Constitutional Conventions
At the first Constitutional Convention in Sydney in 1891, considerable debate occurred over the issue of freedom in interstate trade, especially over the abuses arising from differential and preferential railway rates being put into effect in New South Wales and Victoria. One delegate remarked that "'Nothing has caused more friction than the practice of imposing differential railway rates and so filching trade from a neighbouring colony ... in fact I know of no other cause of strong feeling between the people of these different communities than that which has arisen from commerce."Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The later 1897 convention also saw concerns expressed over the effect such predatory rates were having on the river trade,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. prompting Richard O'Connor to declare that interstate free trade would require institutional, as well as constitutional,[a] protection.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The proposal was strongly endorsed by the Convention, and it was later described by Sir John Quick as being a "necessary adjunct to the Constitution".Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. It was seen as being similar in nature to the US Interstate Commerce Commission and the UK Railway and Canal Commission.[1]Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
History
Delay in creation (1901–1912)
While William Lyne, in his role as the first Minister for Home Affairs, had been working on a draft Bill as early as January 1901 to establish the Commission,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. fiscal pressures brought on by the Braddon Clause[b] discouraged efforts to assure its passage before 1911, as its establishment was viewed to be a luxury.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Lobbying efforts by the Australian shipping industry, incensed that the Commission's scope would include ocean navigation, also contributed to the delay.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. As a result, the initial Bill lapsed in 1902.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
No attempts were made during the Second Parliament of Australia, owing to the House seats split almost evenly between the Protectionist Party, the Free Trade Party and the new Labour Party.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.[c]
The next effort to consider the proposal occurred in the Third Parliament of Australia in 1909, when Senator Sir Robert Best introduced the corresponding bill. It failed to proceed, notably because it was also intended to be an industrial tribunal with power to decide whether certain State industrial awards constituted unfair business competition between the States,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. but the States declined to pass the necessary legislation under the referral power to make the Commission work.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
The commission's establishment occurred during the Fourth Parliament of Australia, at which time State practices concerning interstate rivalry and discrimination were becoming quite blatant.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. Prime Minister Andrew Fisher pushed through the appropriate implementing legislation[3] in 1912.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
First establishment (1912–1920)
In 1913, the newly elected Cook government appointed Albert Piddington as Chief Commissioner, joining George Swinburne and Sir Nicholas Lockyer.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
In addition to wide powers of investigation,[4] the Inter-State Commission Act 1912 granted the Commission judicial power which was broad in scope:
The High Court of Australia disagreed in 1915, ruling by 4–2 in the Wheat Case[5] that the Constitution implicitly created a separation of powers, and therefore judicial power can only be vested in the judiciary.[d] Furthermore, it was held that Chapter Three of the Constitution had the effect that a court must have the following features:
- being vested with judicial power;
- not being vested with power other than judicial power; and
- its members having security of tenure, meaning that members are appointed for life.[e]
The Commission as it then existed violated all three criteria. Hence, as it was not part of the judiciary (i.e., not a "Chapter Three Court"), it could not be vested with judicial power. As a result, the s. 73 provision providing for appeals on questions of law from the Commission to the High Court has been 'dead letter law' for most of the Court's history.
Having lost its judicial power in 1915, the Commission "became a body of inquiry without any power of enforcing its decisions."Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. The Commission, without any real purpose, lapsed in 1920 when the terms of the initial Commissioners expired and new appointments were not made.[7] Although there was discussion in the 1930s about reviving the CommissionLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. (and a bill on that matter actually received Senate passage in 1938Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.), nothing came about, and the Act itself was formally repealed in 1950.[8]
Second establishment (1975–1990)
The Commission was reconstituted by the Whitlam Government in 1975 with the envisaged role of inquiring into transport issues that arose due to the federal structure of the Australian government.[9] Issues on the agenda included Victorian shipping to the Riverina; Bass Strait ferries; and disruptions to Fremantle shipping to the eastern states in 1975. In this second incarnation, the Commission did not have any judicial power, but did have powers of arbitration and adjudication, and of investigation and reporting.
The Commission did not become active due to the dismissal of the Whitlam Government. In 1984, following the re-election of Labor Party under Bob Hawke, the Commission received its appointments and was charged with investigating all matters relating to interstate transport. Its first President was the judge Merv Everett.[10]
In 1990, the Commission was abolished with its functions transferred to a new Industry Commission,[11] a statutory body directly responsible to the Commonwealth Government.[7]
See also
- Constitution of Australia
- Separation of powers in Australia
- Federalism in Australia
- Council of Common Interests
- Inter-State Council
Notes
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ as envisaged in s. 92
- ^ named after Sir Edward Braddon, Premier of Tasmania in the late 1890s, it referred to s. 87 of the Constitution of Australia, which provided for 75% of all receipts arising from customs and excise duties during the first ten years would be remitted to the StatesLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
- ^ Described by Alfred Deakin as three elevens in the field,[2] each fighting against the other two teams.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
- ^ This possibility was contemplated, although described as being "of theoretical interest rather than of practical importance", as early as 1901.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. However, the general views expressed in the Constitutional Debates as to any provision of the Constitution were held in 1904 to be irrelevant to constitutional interpretation in Tasmania v Commonwealth.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.[6]
- ^ as a consequence of the 1977 referendum, this has since been changed to mandatory retirement at age 70
References
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ as constituted under Part I of the Railway and Canal Traffic Act 1888 (51&52 Vict, c. 25)
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Warhaft, Sally, ed. (2004). Well May We Say: The Speeches That Made Australia. Melbourne: Black Inc. pp. 146–148. ISBN 1-86395-277-2.
- ^ Script error: No such module "Template wrapper".
- ^ Inter-State Commission Act 1912, Part III
- ^ New South Wales v Commonwealth ("Wheat case") [1915] HCA 17, (1915) 20 CLR 54 (23 March 1915)
- ^ Tasmania v Commonwealth [1904] HCA 11, (1907) 1 CLR 329 (8 June 1904)
- ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Australian federalism and intergovernmental relations". Australian Federalism: The Role of the States. Federal-State Relations Committee, Parliament of Victoria. October 1998. Archived from the original on 5 August 2009. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
- ^ Script error: No such module "Template wrapper".
- ^ Script error: No such module "Template wrapper"., as amended by the Script error: No such module "Template wrapper".
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bennett, Scott (2010). "EVERETT, Mervyn George (1917–1988)". In Millar, Ann; Browne, Geoffrey (eds.). The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate. Vol. 3. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-86840-996-2.
- ^ Script error: No such module "Template wrapper"., later repealed by Script error: No such module "Template wrapper". upon the creation of the Productivity Commission
Sources
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bell, Andrew (Winter 2009). "The missing constitutional cog: the omission of the Inter-State Commission" (PDF). Bar News: The Journal of the New South Wales Bar Association: 59–74.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gageler, Stephen (2017). "Chapter IV: The Inter-State Commission and the Regulation of Trade and Commerce under the Australian Constitution" (PDF). Public Law Review. 28 (3): 205–218.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Quick, John (1901). The Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth. Sydney/Melbourne: Angus & Robertson/Melville & Mullen. pp. 895–922.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.la Nauze, J.A. (1937). "The Inter-State Commission". The Australian Quarterly. 9 (1): 48–58. doi:10.2307/20629406. JSTOR 20629406.
Further reading
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Radbone, Ian (1982). "The Inter-State Commission". Australian Journal of Public Administration. 41 (4): 323–338. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1982.tb00936.x.(subscription required)