Line (unit)
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "For". Template:DMCA The line (abbreviated L or l or ‴ or lin.) was a small English unit of length, variously reckoned as Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄10, Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄12, Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄16, or Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄40 of an inch.[a] It was not included among the units defined in the Weights and Measures Act 1824, which established the British Imperial units of measurement system.
Size
The line was not recognized by any statute of the English Parliament but was usually understood as Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄4 of a barleycorn,[1] (which itself was recognized by statute as Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄3 of an inch[2]) making it Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄12 of an inch, and Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄144 of a foot. The line was eventually decimalized as Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄10 of an inch, without recourse to barleycorns.[3]
The US button trade uses the same or a similar term but defined as one-fortieth of the US-customary inch (making a button-maker's line equal to 0.635 mm (0.0250 in)).[4][5]
In use
Botanists formerly used the unit (usually as Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄12 inch) to measure the size of plant parts. Linnaeus's Philosophia botanica (1751) includes the Linea in its summary of units of measurements, defining it as Script error: No such module "Lang". [[[:Template:Lit]]]; Stearns gives its length as 2.25 mm (0.089 in). Even after metrication, British botanists continued to employ tools with gradations marked as linea (lines); the British line is approximately 2.1 mm (0.083 in) and the Paris line approximately 2.3 mm (0.091 in).[6]
Entomologists in the UK and other European countries in the 1800s used lines as a unit of measurement for insects, at least for the relatively large mantids and phasmids. Examples include Westwood,[7][8] in the UK, and de Haan[9] in the Netherlands.
Gunsmiths and armament companies also employed the Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄10-inch line (the "decimal line"), in part owing to the importance of the German and Russian arms industries.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. These are now given in terms of millimeters, but the seemingly arbitrary 7.62 mm (0.30 in) caliber was originally understood as a 3-line caliber (as with the 1891 Mosin–Nagant rifle). The 12.7 mm (0.50 in) caliber used by the M2 Browning machine gun was similarly a 5-line caliber.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
Other 'line' units
Other similar small units called lines include:
- The Russian Script error: No such module "Lang". (ли́ния), Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄10 of the diuym, which had been set precisely equal to an English inch by Peter the GreatLua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
- The French Script error: No such module "Lang". or "Paris line", Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄12 of the French inch (Template:Langx), 2.256 mm and about 1.06 L.
- The Portuguese Script error: No such module "Lang"., Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄12 of the Portuguese inch or 12 "points" (Script error: No such module "Lang".) or 2.29 mm
- The German Script error: No such module "Lang". was usually Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄12 of the German inch but sometimes also Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄10 German inch
- The Vienna line, Page Template:Fraction/styles.css has no content.1⁄12 of a Vienna inch.[10][11]
See also
Notes
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
References
Citations
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Barleycorn". Oxford Dictionary of English (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
a former unit of measurement (about a third of an inch) based on the length of a grain of barley
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Fowler, W. (1884). "On the ancient terms applicable to the measurement of land". Transactions. Vol. XVI. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. p. 277.
- ^ Jefferson,Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found. republished by Niles.Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Footnotes/anchor_id_list' not found.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."An Easy Guide to Button Measurement and Sizing". Sun Mei Button Enterprise Co., Ltd. 19 June 2019.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.The Metric System | Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Manufactures, United States Senate, Sixty-seventh Congress, First and Second Sessions on S. 2267 a Bill to Fix the Metric System of Weights and Measures as the Single Standard of Weights and Measures for Certain Uses. By United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Manufactures. 11 October 1921. p. 216.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Stearn, W.T. (1992). Botanical Latin: History, grammar, syntax, terminology, and vocabulary (Fourth ed.). David and Charles.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Westwood, J.O. (1859). Catalogue of the Orthopterous Insects in the Collection of British Museum. Part I: Phasmidae. British Museum, London.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Westwood, J.O. (1889). Revisio Insectorum Familiae Mantidarum, speciebus novis aut minus cognitis descriptis et delineatis. – Revisio Mantidarum. Gurney & Jackson, London.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Haan, W.de (1842). Bijdragen tot de Kennis Orthoptera. in C.J. Temminck, Verhandelingen over de natuurlijke Geschiedenis der Nederlandsche overzeesche Bezittingen. volume 2.
- ^ Albert Johannsen. "Manual of petrographic methods". p. 623.
- ^ Karl Wilhelm Naegeli; Simon Schwendener. "The Microscope in Theory and Practice". p. 294.
Bibliography
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Cardarelli, F. (2004), Encyclopaedia of Scientific Units, Weights and Measures: Their SI Equivalences and Origins, 2nd ed., Springer, ISBN 1-85233-682-X.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Hogg, Ian V.; et al. (1991), Military Small Arms of the 20th Century, 6th ed., Guild Publishing.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Jefferson, Thomas (4 July 1790), Report on the Subject of Measures, Weights, and Coins, New York.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Niles, Hezekiah, ed. (1814), "Jefferson on Weights and Measures: Letter from the Secretary of State to the Speaker of the House of Representatives: New-York, July 4, 1790", The Weekly Register, vol. V (Sept. 1813 – Mar. 1814), Baltimore: Franklin Press, pp. 20–26.