Narten present

Template:Short description Narten present is a proposed inflectional class of the Proto-Indo-European verb, named after the Indo-Iranianist Johanna Narten who posited its existence in 1968. It is characterized by accent on the root in all of the person-number forms.

Roots having Narten presents always possess a surface accent, having a lengthened grade R(ḗ) in the singular active, and a full-grade R(é) in the rest of the active forms, as well as the mediopassive. The proposed examples of roots having such acrostatic presents include the following:

Template:Wikt-lang ~ h₁éd- "to eat" h₁ḗh₂gʷʰ- ~ *h₁éh₂gʷʰ- "to drink" ḱḗHs- ~ *ḱéHs- "to instruct" dḗHḱ- ~ *déHḱ- "to honor" wḗḱ- ~ *wéḱ- "to ask, demand" wḗh₂- ~ *wéh₂- "to turn"	Narten present in the PIE root *stew- "to praise; declare" person-number-tense Sanskrit Ancient Greek PIE Root form 3rd-person singular active stáuti - *stḗw-ti R(ḗ), i.e., strong 3rd-person-singular-middle stáve στεύται (steútai) *stéw-(t)oy R(é), i.e., weak

These forms are best reflected in Indo-Iranian and Hittite, with relics surviving in other languages, particularly in the root "to eat".

Narten roots

In 1994 Jochem Schindler suggested the existence of what is called Narten roots – roots exhibiting a systematic *R(ḗ) ~ *R(é) ablaut in both nominal and verbal derivations, as opposed to the more common R(e) ~ R(Ø) pattern. These roots always carried a surface accent, and such ablaut is called more generally Narten ablaut. The other roots would then be non-Narten roots, exhibiting the R(e) ~ R(Ø) ablaut and allowing the accent to move away from the root. However, the linguist Michiel de Vaan reviewed the Avestan words cited in support of Schindler's theory, concluding that none of the adduced Avestan forms [remain] as trustworthy evidence for PIE 'upgraded' ablaut." Certain terms such as the noun , which exists beside the Narten verb (whence Sanskrit ), have been cited in support of the existence of so-called Narten roots. However, the philologist Michael Weiss suggests that these nominal formations with Narten-ablaut were perhaps remodeled analogically after the verb, a phenomenon that—according to the linguist H. Craig Melchert—is not unusual for Indo-European languages. According to the linguist Melanie Malzahn, the presumption of analogically innovated lengthened grades can help explain the development of certain Tocharian terms, such as ("piece of cloth"), which—according to Malzahn—perhaps reflects earlier pre-Proto-Tocharian , which itself perhaps underwent influence from the Narten verb . Though, Malzahn does not consider these terms sufficient evidence for the existence of "Narten roots," but instead merely reflective of an occasional analogical process.

It has also been shown that verbal roots exhibiting Narten ablaut occur in the same morphophonological environments as the roots with mobile accentuation and, furthermore, that nominal stems exhibiting acrostatic Narten ablaut *R(ḗ) ~ *R(é) occur in the same morphophonological environments as roots undergoing the more usual R(ó) ~ R(é) type. This insight has led to the development of modern theories regarding the relation of PIE accent, ablaut and the resulting ablaut classes: all roots, suffixes and inflectional endings (desinences) can be inherently "accented" or not, and the surfacing stress (i.e. the accent of the PIE word) falls on only one syllable, depending on the interplay of underlying accentuation of the combining morphemes.

Function

Melchert argues that Narten verbs were actually characterized presents expressing a unique lexical aspect that existed alongside ordinary root presents. In support of this theory, Melchert notes the existence of Hittite ("to demand"), which perhaps reflects a Narten verb , whereas a Sanskrit form ("to wish") derives from , a separate athematic present belonging to the same root. Regarding this particular example, Melchert argues that the Hittite and Sanskrit verbs showcase distinct semantics, with the Hittite form exclusively expressing the eventive meaning "to desire," whereas the Sanskrit form displays the stative meaning "to wish." However, the etymology of the Hittite word is not uncontroversial: Kloekhorst alternatively opts to derive the form from the same original root present as Sanskrit, though this theory is rejected by Melchert. Regarding the semantics of the Hittite term, Melchert proposes that the original Narten verb expressed an inceptive meaning "to initiate a wish," which evolved into "to demand," in the same fashion as English (i.e. in statements such as "I want it").

The linguist Martin Kümmel suggests that the Narten-type perhaps formed imperfective verbs from root aorists, as there are Narten presents such as (see Sanskrit ) that may have coexisted alongside aorists such as (see Ancient Greek , “Template:Grc-transl”). However, regarding this particular example, Beekes alternatively reconstructs an original reduplicated present stem as the source of the Sanskrit forms, thereby rejecting the existence of an original Narten-type verb. Kümmel argues that the Narten verbs displayed a durative value in contrast to the telic value of the aorists, as indicated by forms such as ("to be creating"), which belongs to the root ("to create, craft"). Alternatively, the linguists Petr Kocharov and Andrey Shatskov argue that Narten verbs formed causative verbs from the intransitive equivalents of transitive roots. In support of this theory, they cite formations such Sanskrit , which derives from the Narten form , itself from the root ("to notice"). The intransitive counterpart of the original root sense would have been something such as "to become noticed/noticeable," the causative of which would have been "to make noticed/noticeable," whence perhaps the ultimate Sanskrit sense of "to venerate."

Internal reconstruction

Narten presents were possibly archaic within Indo-European, as the class is attested in word equations between ancient Indo-European languages, such as Hittite , Ancient Greek (Template:Grc-transl), and Sanskrit , all of which reflect a Proto-Indo-European deponent Narten mediopassive present . However, Kocharov and Shatskov argue that a more recent date for the creation of the Narten-type is evidenced by the limited productivity of the verbal class, which is largely confined to a select few Indo-European branches, such as Indo-Iranian.

Regarding the origin of the type within IE, Kocharov and Shatskov propose that Proto-Indo-European originally marked the default meaning of a verb with the full-grade in either the active or middle singular. Thus, as they argue, a mediopassive verb such as ("to be lying flat") formed a present with a full grade in the singular, while an active verb such as contained the full grade in the active singular. Within this theory, a verb with a default active transitive meaning could form an intransitive mediopassive counterpart marked by the zero-grade in the singular. Thus, the active verb ("to say") exists in contrast to the intransitive mediopassive form ("to be called"). Essentially, this theory maintains that, for active verbs, the ablaut alternation between full grade in the active singular and the zero-grade in the mediopassive singular encoded a shift in transitivity. Ultimately, Kocharov and Shatskov suggest that the Narten-class was back-formed the aforementioned full grade mediopassive terms and acquired the ablaut by analogy to the pattern of active transitive verbs. Alternatively, these full grade mediopassive terms have been interpreted as merely the middle forms of a Narten verb.

Narten-type ablaut with a lengthened-grade singular and a full grade elsewhere is speculated to have been the original form of the Proto-Indo-European s-aorist, which had the root in the lengthened e-grade in Indo-Iranian, Italic and Slavic, but in the full-grade in Greek and the Indo-Iranian middle.

Proto-Indo-European long-vowel preterites with */ē/ in the root are according to some originally imperfects of Narten presents, which explains the lengthened grade.

Acceptance and criticism

The existence of Narten roots has been disputed in recent years. According to Template:Harvcoltxt the lengthened grade stem in the singular was formed complementary to root aorist, replacing the secondary endings by primary endings and changing the ablaut vowel. Template:Harvcoltxt analyzes the evidence collected by Schindler and Narten on acrostatic inflection in Avestan and PIE and concludes that "the concept of 'Narten' roots can be abandoned altogether.". On the other hand, Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben classifies Narten roots under the type (1b) "acrodynamic present", reconstructing in total 52 PIE roots belonging to this inflectional class, of which 32 are marked as "certain" and 20 as "uncertain".

References

• Beekes, Robert S. P. (2010), Etymological Dictionary of Greek, Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series, vol. 10, with the assistance of Lucien van Beek, Leiden, Boston: Brill, ISBN 9789004174207

• Clackson, James (2007), Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction, New York: Cambridge University Press
• de Vaan, Michiel (2004), "'Narten' roots from the Avestan point of view", in Adam Hyllested (ed.), Per Aspera Ad Asteriscos. Studia Indogermanica in honorem Jens Elmegard Rasmussen sexagenarii Idibus Martiis anno MMIV, Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck, pp. 591–599
• Fortson, Benjamin W. IV (2004), Indo-European Language and Culture, Blackwell, ISBN 1-4051-0316-7
• Kloekhorst, Alwin (2008). Lubotsky, Alexander (ed.). Etymological Dictionary Of The Hittite Inherited Lexicon (PDF). Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series. Vol. 5. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-16092-7. ISSN 1574-3586.
• Kocharov, Petr; Shatskov, Andrey (2022). "CAUSATIVIZATION OF PHENOMENON-BASED EXPERIENTIAL VERBS AND NARTEN-LENGTHENING" (PDF). Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology (26): 627–634. doi:10.30842/ielcp230690152642.
• Kümmel, Martin (1998), "Wurzelpräsens neben Wurzelaorist im Indogermanischen" [Present root next to aorist root in Indo-Germanic], Historische Sprachforschung, 111 (2): 191–208
• Melchert, H. Craig (2014-11-01). ""Narten formations" versus "Narten roots"". Indogermanische Forschungen. 119 (1): 251–258. doi:10.1515/if-2014-0013. ISSN 0019-7262.
• Narten, Johanna (1968), "Zum 'proterodynamischen' Wurzelpräsens", in J. C. Heesterman; et al. (eds.), Pratidānam: Indian, Iranian and Indo-Iranian Studies Presented to F. B. J. Kuiper on his Sixtieth Birthday (in German), The Hague: Mouton, pp. 9–19{{citation}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
• Lundquist, Jesse; Yates, Anthony D. (2018-06-11), Klein, Jared; Joseph, Brian; Fritz, Matthias (eds.), "122. The morphology of Proto-Indo-European" (PDF), Volume 3 Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics, De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 2079–2195, doi:10.1515/9783110542431-043, ISBN 978-3-11-054243-1, retrieved 2025-10-14{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
• Malzahn, Melanie (2014-11-01). "Surprise at length of Tocharian nouns". Indogermanische Forschungen (in Deutsch). 119 (1): 259–268. doi:10.1515/if-2014-0014. ISSN 1613-0405.
• Rix, Helmut (2001), Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben: Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen (in German) (2nd ed.), Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert, ISBN 3-89500-219-4{{citation}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
• Schindler, Jochem (1994), "Alte und neue Fragen zum indogermanischen Nomen", in Jens Elmegård Rasmussen (ed.), In honorem Holger Pedersen. Kolloquium der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft 1993 in Kopenhagen (in German), Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert, pp. 397–400{{citation}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
• Sihler, Andrew L. (1995), New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-508345-8
• Svensson, Miguel Villanueva (2012), "The ablaut of the middle root athematic presents in Indo-European", in Melchert, Craig (ed.), The Indo-European Verb, Proceedings of the Conference of the Society for Indo-European Studies, Wiesbaden: Reichert Verlag
• Weiss, Michael L. (2009). Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin. Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press. ISBN 978-0-9747927-5-0.

See also

• Proto-Indo-European language
• Proto-Indo-European verbs