Non-binding resolution
Template:Short description A non-binding resolution is a motion adopted by a deliberative body that does not enact a law or a substantive rule, and is simply used to make known what the opinions of that body are in relation to a certain fact or event.
This type of resolution is often used to express the body's approval or disapproval of something that they cannot otherwise vote on,[1] due to the matter being handled by another jurisdiction, or being protected by a constitution. An example would be a resolution of support for a nation's troops in battle, which carries no legal weight, but is adopted for moral support.
Use
Non-binding resolutions are usually specific simple or concurrent resolutions that are not passed on to the executive branch to be signed into the law.[2] These resolutions differ from pure concurrent resolutions (that are used for various procedural requests such as adjourning sessions) in that they are designed to express formally, document opinions and not initiate a process.
These resolutions offer a means for elected officials to publicly air the concerns of their constituents[3] and are closely followed by major media outlets. Additionally, these resolutions can be used to state the position of the legislature, showing a preview of how they will vote on future legislation and budget allocations.
Notable historic uses
Canada
- Private Members Motion 296 in support of Jordan's Principle was passed unanimously in the House of Commons of Canada on December 12, 2007.
- Motion 312 was a motion introduced to the Parliament of Canada by Stephen Woodworth, MP for Kitchener Centre, in 2012. M-312 called for the formation of a committee "to review the declaration in Subsection 223(1) of the Criminal Code which states that a child becomes a human being only at the moment of complete birth".[4]
- Motion 103 was a non-binding motion in the 42nd Canadian Parliament stating that the members of the House of Commons called on the Government of Canada to condemn Islamophobia in Canada. It also called on the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage to carry out a study on how racism and religious discrimination can be reduced and collect data on hate crimes. The motion was introduced by Iqra Khalid, the Liberal MP representing Mississauga—Erin Mills. The motion passed by a vote of 201–91 on March 23, 2017.
United Nations
Script error: No such module "Labelled list hatnote".
- All United Nations General Assembly resolutions that are not about matters internal to the UN (such as the structure of the UN or the creation of UN agencies) are inherently and explicitly (in the UN Charter) non-binding.
- The United Nations Security Council has the power to pass both binding and non-binding resolutions; whether a resolution is binding depends on what section of the Charter it is enacted under.
United States
In the United States Congress, non-binding resolutions are frequently titled as a "Sense of Congress" resolution, if both houses pass the measure (a concurrent resolution), or as a "Sense of the Senate" or "Sense of the House" resolution, if the measure is passed by only one house (a simple resolution).[5][6]
- On June 22, 1971, the Senate passed a non-binding resolution in support of withdrawing troops from Vietnam.[7]
- In July 1998, the Senate passed a non-binding resolution[8] affirming their commitment to a democratic Taiwan.
- In February 2007, the House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution,[9] House Concurrent resolution 63,[10] to formally express its disapproval of President Bush's troop buildup in Iraq.[11]
- House of Representatives passed a non-binding resolution (HRES 224),[12] recognizing March 14, 2009, as National Pi Day.[13]
A "sense of Congress" clause may also be used within legislation to direct the actions which Congress wishes the executive to undertake, for example: Template:Quote
The legislatures of the 50 U.S. states also frequently adopt non-binding resolutions. For example:
- In February 2007, the House of Representatives[14] and Senate[15] of the State of Vermont respectively passed non-binding resolutions calling for the orderly withdrawal of American military forces from Iraq to commence immediately.
See also
References
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Holland, Joshua (2007-02-15). "It's Way Too Late for Nonbinding Resolutions on Iraq". AlterNet. Retrieved 2007-02-17.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.The Associated Press (2007-02-03). "What's a nonbinding resolution?". nwsource.com. Retrieved 2007-02-17. [dead link]
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Profita, Hillary (2006-06-16). "Why A Non-Binding Resolution Gets A Lot of Attention". cbsnews.com. Retrieved 2007-02-17.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Vote No. 466". House of Commons Chamber Business. Parliament of Canada. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 11 November 2012.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McCormick, James M. (2014). American Foreign Policy and Process. Wadsworth. p. 322. ISBN 978-1-4354-6272-4. LCCN 2012955710.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Serafino, Nina M.; Ekmektsioglou, Eleni G. (2018). "Congress and National Security". In Reveron, Derek S.; Gvosdev, Nikolas K.; Cloud, John A. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of U.S. National Security. Oxford University Press. p. 161. ISBN 9780190680015. LCCN 2017043933.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Vietnam War 1969–1975". The History Place. Retrieved 2007-10-11.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Moore, Janet (1998-07-01). "Senate Passes Non-Binding Resolution To Reassure Taiwan". cnn.com. Retrieved 2007-02-15.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."110th Congress, 1st Session H. CON. RES" (PDF). speaker.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-02-15.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."U.S. House of Representatives Roll Call Votes 110th Congress, 1st Session". clerk.house.gov. 2007. Retrieved 2007-02-17.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Toner, Robin; Michael Luo (2007-02-13). "House Democrats Unveil Measure Denouncing Iraq Buildup". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-02-15.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."H. Res. 224". 2009-03-12. Archived from the original on 2014-12-10. Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.McCullagh, Declan (March 11, 2009). "National Pi Day? Congress makes it official". Politics and Law. CNET News. Archived from the original on 2022-03-18. Retrieved 2009-03-14.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Legislative Documents".
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Legislative Documents".
