Radical trust
Template:Short description Template:DMCA
Page Module:Message box/ambox.css has no content.Page Template:Multiple issues/styles.css has no content.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
Page Module:Message box/ambox.css has no content.
|
Radical trust is the confidence that any structured organization, such as a government, library, business, religion,[1] or museum, has in collaboration and empowerment within online communities. Specifically, it pertains to the use of blogs, wiki and online social networking platforms by organizations to cultivate relationships with an online community that then can provide feedback and direction for the organization's interest. The organization 'trusts' and uses that input in its management.
One of the first appearances of the notion of radical trust appears in an info graphic outlining the base principles of web 2.0 in Tim O'Reilly's weblog post "What is Web 2.0". Radical Trust is listed as the guiding example of trusting the validity of consumer generated media.[2]
This concept is considered to be an underlying assumption of Library 2.0. The adoption of radical trust by a library would require its management let go of some of its control over the library and building an organization without an end result in mind. The direction a library would take would be based on input provided by people through online communities. These changes in the organization may merely be anecdotal in nature, making this method of organization management dramatically distinct from data-based or evidence based management.[3]
In marketing, Collin Douma further describes the notion of radical trust as a key mindset required for marketers and advertisers to enter the social media marketing space. Conventional marketing dictates and maintains control of messages to cause the greatest persuasion in consumer decisions, but Douma argued that in the social media space, brands would need to cede that control in order to build brand loyalty.[4][5][permanent dead link]
References
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Schertz, Mary (4 September 2007). "Living by the Word". The Christian Century. Vol. 124, no. 18. pp. 18–19.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.O'Reilly, Tim (30 September 2005). "What Is Web 2.0". O'Reilly. Archived from the original on 24 April 2025. Retrieved 28 April 2025.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Harris, Christopher (2006). "A matter of (radical) trust". School Library Journal. 52 (11): 50–53.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Gardner, James (2020). "Trust, Risk and Historical Authority: Negotiating Public History in Digital and Analog Worlds". In Ashton, Paul; Evans, Tanya; Hamilton, Paula (eds.). Making Histories. Berlin/München/Boston: de Gruyter. pp. 59–67. doi:10.1515/9783110636352. ISBN 978-3-11-063635-2.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Douma, Collin (16 June 2006). "Radical Trust" (PDF). Marketing Magazine.
Further reading
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Chan, Sebastian; Spadaccini, Jim (1 March 2007). Radical Trust: The State of the Museum Blogosphere. Museums and the Web 2007. Archived from the original on 18 February 2025.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Fichter, Darlene (2 April 2006). "Web 2.0, Library 2.0 and Radical Trust: A First Take". Archived from the original on 25 April 2006.
- Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bolan, Kimberly; Canada, Meg; Cullin, Rob (2007). "Web, Library, and Teen Services 2.0" (PDF). Young Adult Library Services. 5 (2): 40–43. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 March 2023.
