Sexual orientation discrimination
Template:Short description Script error: No such module "Redirect-distinguish".
Page Module:Message box/ambox.css has no content.Page Template:Multiple issues/styles.css has no content.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
Page Module:Message box/ambox.css has no content.
|
Template:LGBT rights sidebar Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Sidebar/configuration' not found. Sexual orientation discrimination (also known as sexualism)[citation needed] is discrimination based on a person's sex, sexual orientation, or pregnancy.[not in body]
Sexual bias
Sexual orientation discrimination often comes up in the context of employment actions.[1][better source needed] It refers to sexual prejudice, a negative attitude towards someone that is based on their sexual orientation.[2] An example of this bias is homophobia, which refers to discrimination towards someone who is homosexual. Often in the work environment, this is seen with heterosexual individuals who are prejudiced against lesbian, gay, and bisexual people (among others). This is specifically referred to as heterosexism.[citation needed]
An earlier definition of this term is: Sexual orientation discrimination is a belief or argument that one sexual orientation or sexual behavior is inherently superior to some or all others. Usually, it comes in the form of heterosexuality being considered the only natural, normal, or moral mode of sexual behavior, and is also used to refer to the effects of that instinct. The word heterosexism has also been proposed to mean essentially the same thing as this form of sexual orientation discrimination.[3] This word has been suggested as an alternative to homophobia,[4] in part because it uses a parallel structure to sexism or racism. The intent of the concept of heterosexism is the examination of the cultural bias against non-heterosexuals rather than individual bias, which is the focus of homophobia, as well as the adverse effects of normative heterosexuality on heterosexual-identifying people.[5]
Forms of discrimination
Employment actions
Employment actions (or ultimate employment actions), refer to hiring, firing, demotions, promotions, and compensation.[6] Adverse employment actions, however, include termination, demotions, suspension, and changes to conditions, responsibilities and pay.[7] Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex. In Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court found that adverse employment actions made due to an employee's sexual orientation or gender identity violate Title VII.[8]
Service provision
Sexual orientation discrimination also occurs at the time of service provision from a business or government agency to an individual or group. Such services may include dining at a restaurant, visiting a partner at the hospital, receiving healthcare, or acquiring a marriage license.[citation needed]
Sexuality or sexual nature
The term pansexualism, seen especially in the field of early-20th-century psychoanalysis,[9] was based on the usage of the term "sexualism" to refer to humanity's sexual nature. The terms "homosexualism" and "bisexuals" were also based on this usage, and were commonly used before the general adoption of the terms homosexuality and bisexuality.[10][11]
Key court decisions
Latta v. Otter
Latta v. Otter is a court case that resulted from a federal lawsuit filed by four couples from Boise, Idaho, where same-sex marriage remained illegal until the couples' victory in 2014.[12] Before Latta v. Otter, only 16 U.S. states had legalized same-sex marriage,[13][14] and Idaho refused to recognize same-sex marriages performed in such states. On September 8, 2014, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Idaho's ban on same-sex marriage was a violation of the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal protection.[15]
Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges is the landmark civil rights case that resulted in federal legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States. In July 2013, James Obergefell and John Arthur James filed a lawsuit in the state of Ohio because it refused to recognize same-sex marriages on death certificates. In September 2013, the lawsuit was amended to include a second gay couple and a funeral director who feared prosecution for falsifying death certificates if he were to note same-sex spouses on gay clients' documents.
Hively v. Ivy Tech Community, College of Indiana
Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College restuled in an 8-3 decision by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals that sex discrimination includes homophobia, and therefore violates federal civil rights law.[16] Part-time professor and open lesbian Kimberley Hively applied multiple times for full-time employment. Still, she was not approved, and her contract was not renewed. She claimed that this was due to her sexuality, and filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The Seventh Circuit Court ruled in her favor.[17]
Bostock v. Clayton County
Before the Bostock v. Clayton County case, the language of Title VII in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 left the phrase 'based on sex' up for interpretation. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has recognized members of the LGBTQ community as a protected class under Title VII since 2013, but even in 2020, only 21 states had extended employment discrimination protections to members the LGBTQ community.[18] The Bostock ruling found that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity would be considered discrimination based on sex.[citation needed]
See also
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Discrimination against asexual people
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
- Template:Annotated link
References
Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.
- ^ Berry, John, "Sexual Orientation Discrimination in the Current State of the Law (2017)" Script error: No such module "webarchive".
- ^ Matlin, Margaret W., Ph.D., "The Psychology of Women", (2004)
- ^ Corsini, Raymond J., The Dictionary of Psychology (2001), Template:ISBN
- ^ Herek, Gregory M., Ph.D., "Beyond 'Homophobia': Thinking About Sexual Prejudice and Stigma in the Twenty-First Century." Sexuality Research & Social Policy (April 2004)
- ^ Jackson, S. (2006) Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: the complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7 ( 1). pp. 105-121. ISSN 1464-7001
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Rusie, Michael (January 2002). "The Meaning of Adverse Employment Actions in the Context of Title VII Retaliation Claims". Washington University Journal of Law and Policy. 9 (1): 385. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bachman, Eric. "What Counts as an "Adverse Employment Action" in Discrimination and Retaliation Cases?". Forbes. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Wolf, Richard (15 June 2020). "Supreme Court grants federal job protections to gay, lesbian, transgender workers". USA Today. Retrieved 11 January 2024.
- ^ Malinowski, Bronislaw, Sex and Repression in Savage Society (1927)
- ^ Kodaigaku - 'Bi-sexualism in Buddhist Literature', by Kodaigaku Kyōkai (Japan)
- ^ ' For Sex Education, See Librarian: A Guide to Issues and Resources,' by Martha Cornog, Timothy Perper (1996)
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Latta v. Otter". National Center for Lesbian Rights. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Same-Sex Marriage, State by State". Pew Research Center. 26 June 2015. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Arthur, Dylan. "Gay dating". Retrieved 11 September 2023.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Latta v. Otter". National Center for Lesbian Rights. Retrieved 10 January 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College". Lambda Legal. Retrieved 24 January 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College". Harvard Law Review. 9 March 2018. Retrieved 25 January 2022.
- ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Bynum, Russ; Kastanis, Angeliki (20 April 2021). "AP analysis: Most states lack laws protecting LGBT workers". Associated Press News. Associated Press. Retrieved 7 January 2022.
Further reading
- White, Chris, 'Nineteenth-century Writings on Homosexuality: a sourcebook' - Template:ISBN
- Wolman, Benjamin B., 'International Encyclopedia of Psychiatry, Psychology, Psychoanalysis & Neurology' (1977)
- Fish, J. Heterosexism in Health & Social Care. Basingstoke: Palgrave. (2006)
- Jackson, S. (2006) Gender, sexuality and heterosexuality: the complexity (and limits) of heteronormativity. Feminist Theory, 7 (1). pp. 105–121. Script error: No such module "CS1 identifiers".. Script error: No such module "CS1 identifiers"..
- Michael Rusie, The Meaning of Adverse Employment Actions in the Context of Title VII Retaliation Claims, 9 WASH. U. J. L. & POL'Y 379 (2002), https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol9/iss1/11
- Bachman, Eric. "What Counts as an 'Adverse Employment Action' in Discrimination and Retaliation Cases?" Forbes, Forbes Magazine, 17 Nov. 2021, https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericbachman/2021/11/15/what-counts-as-an-adverse-employment-action-in-discrimination-and-retaliation-cases/.
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Navbox/configuration' not found.
