Weinberg angle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:Short description

Weinberg angle θW, and relation between couplings g, Template:Prime, and e = g sin θW. Adapted from Lee (1981).[1]
File:Electroweak.svg
The pattern of weak isospin, T3, and weak hypercharge, YW, of the known elementary particles, showing electric charge, Q,[a] along the Weinberg angle. The neutral Higgs field (upper left, circled) breaks the electroweak symmetry and interacts with other particles to give them mass. Three components of the Higgs field become part of the massive W and Z bosons.

The weak mixing angle or Weinberg angle[2] is a parameter in the Weinberg–Salam theory (by Steven Weinberg and Abdus Salam) of the electroweak interaction, part of the Standard Model of particle physics, and is usually denoted as θW. It is the angle by which spontaneous symmetry breaking rotates the original Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle". and Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle". vector boson plane, producing as a result the Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle". boson, and the photon.[3] Its measured value is slightly below 30°, but also varies, very slightly increasing, depending on how high the relative momentum of the particles involved in the interaction is that the angle is used for.[4]

Details

The algebraic formula for the combination of the Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle". and Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle". vector bosons (i.e. 'mixing') that simultaneously produces the massive Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle". boson and the massless photon (Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle".) is expressed by the formula

Template:In5(γ𝖹0)=(cosθ𝗐sinθ𝗐sinθ𝗐cosθ𝗐)(𝖡0𝖶0).[3]

The weak mixing angle also gives the relationship between the masses of the W and Z bosons (denoted as mW and mZ),

Template:In5m𝖹=m𝖶cosθ𝗐.

The angle can be expressed in terms of the SU(2)L and U(1)Y couplings (weak isospin g and weak hypercharge Template:Prime, respectively),

Template:In5cosθ𝗐=g g2+g' 2  and sinθ𝗐=g g2+g' 2 .

The electric charge is then expressible in terms of it, e = g sin θw = Template:Prime cos θw (refer to the figure).

Because the value of the mixing angle is currently determined empirically, in the absence of any superseding theoretical derivation it is mathematically defined as

Template:In5cosθ𝗐= m𝖶 m𝖹.[5]

The value of θw varies as a function of the momentum transfer, q, at which it is measured. This variation, or 'running', is a key prediction of the electroweak theory. The most precise measurements have been carried out in electron–positron collider experiments at a value of q = 91.2 GeV/c, corresponding to the mass of the Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle". boson, mZ.

In practice, the quantity sin2 θw is more frequently used. The 2004 best estimate of sin2 θw, at q = 91.2 GeV/c, in the MS scheme is 0.23120±0.00015, which is an average over measurements made in different processes, at different detectors. Atomic parity violation experiments yield values for sin2 θw at smaller values of q, below 0.01 GeV/c, but with much lower precision. In 2005 results were published from a study of parity violation in Møller scattering in which a value of sin2 θw = 0.2397±0.0013 was obtained at q = 0.16 GeV/c, establishing experimentally the so-called 'running' of the weak mixing angle. These values correspond to a Weinberg angle varying between 28.7° and 29.3° ≈ 30°. LHCb measured in 7 and 8 TeV proton–proton collisions an effective angle of sin2 θeff
w
= 0.23142
,[6] though the value of q for this measurement is determined by the partonic collision energy, which is close to the Z boson mass.

CODATA 2022[4] gives the value

Template:In5sin2θ𝗐=1( m𝖶 m𝖹)2=0.22305(23).[b]

The massless photon (Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle".) couples to the unbroken electric charge, Q = T3 + Page Template:Sfrac/styles.css has no content. 1 / 2 Yw, while the Script error: No such module "Subatomic particle". boson couples to the broken charge T3Q sin2 θw.

Footnotes

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ The electric charge Q is distinct from the similar-appearing symbol occasionally used for momentum-transfer Q. This article uses q, but upper case is common and may occur in some graphs.
  2. ^ Note that at present, there is no generally accepted theory that explains why the measured value θw ≈ 29° should be what it is. The specific value is not predicted by the Standard Model: The Weinberg angle θw is an open, free parameter, although it is constrained and predicted through other measurements of Standard Model quantities.

References

Page Template:Reflist/styles.css has no content.

  1. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Lee, T.D. (1981). "Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory". Physics Today. 34 (12): 55. Bibcode:1981PhT....34l..55L. doi:10.1063/1.2914386.
  2. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Glashow, Sheldon (February 1961). "Partial-symmetries of weak interactions". Nuclear Physics. 22 (4): 579–588. Bibcode:1961NucPh..22..579G. doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2.
  3. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Cheng, T.P.; Li, L.F. (2006). Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 349–355. ISBN 0-19-851961-3.
  4. ^ a b Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content."Weak mixing angle". The NIST reference on constants, units, and uncertainty. 2022 CODATA value. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 30 May 2024. Retrieved 2024-05-30.
  5. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Okun, L.B. (1982). Leptons and Quarks. North-Holland Physics Publishing. p. 214. ISBN 0-444-86924-7.
  6. ^ Page Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css has no content.Aaij, R.; Adeva, B.; Adinolfi, M.; Affolder, A.; Ajaltouni, Z.; Akar, S.; et al. (2015-11-27). "Measurement of the forward-backward asymmetry in Z/γ → μ+μ decays and determination of the effective weak mixing angle". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (11): 190. arXiv:1509.07645. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)190. hdl:1721.1/116170. ISSN 1029-8479. S2CID 118478870.